Housing is a Civil Right

Housing is a Civil Right
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com

Friday, April 19, 2019

Will Keker Van Nest Lawyers Defend Facebook Racist and Defamatory Messages Sent to Plaintiff King's Girlfriends?

As to the Proposed ORDER: IDK... Just my $.02 but it makes sense, right?
Regardless of how much the Internet mafia hates my black ass, they know I'm CORRECT.
And you had better believe there is an Internet mafia.
That's OK. I've got other resources they don't even know about. But they will.

I told the Deputy Legal Director of the #ACLU, who has recently tweeted supporting the Facebook law firm. No way can she support their position if they refuse to provide the information. That's foul. Slander per se this is. Conduct involving moral turpitude.
You better believe I know my First Amendment-relate Law folks. 
Like the back of my hand. They are DONE. I can't wait to get before Judge Orrick.
I am chomping at the bit. They.... are not. I guarantee you this.
Then FB banning all of my blog pages as being in violation of community standards?
Momma, this one's for you honey. I got this.

Yep. I sure do
See Zerlie Charles v. Vickie D. Vest, Indiana Ct. App. No. 72A01-1706-SC-01252 (October 24, 2017) and Dial v. Hammond 15-CV-05383 N. Carolina Buncombe Superior (2015). Case settled for $500,000.00.  
                                                                         *********
65. In spite of all of this, Defendant allowed Defamatory remarks to be published to Plaintiff’s last girlfriend “MH” in 2018 without recourse from Facebook User “Troy.” When Plaintiff asked Defendant for the identity of the poster Facebook directed the attention away to Plaintiff’s girlfriend. 

66. In 2019 Defendant and Counsel in this case again allowed such Defamatory remarks to be leveled against Plaintiff towards his current girlfriend “SW” by two Facebook accounts “Facebook User” and “Lisa Marie” 

67. The comments in 2018 and in 2019 all indicate, with certainty devoid of any speculation, that Plaintiff “cheats on all of his women” and "Every single woman that he as dated he has used and mentally abused."…. and goes on to state that Plaintiff seeks out white women as gullible, to use for money etc. etc. ad nauseam, basically every negative racist stereotype of black men in this Fine Country. (See Appendix ______). 

68. Plaintiff and “SW” attempted to exhaust all administrative appeals within the Platform structure and Facebook continued to ignore Plaintiff’s Defamation issue and offered a link for “SW” to use that was, and is, nonfunctional. 

69. As such, Plaintiff responded: You are playing stupid. Again: I have a VALID CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION ON MY OWN. So you need to give me that goddamn information right now.....

*********  
Dear Attorney Spencer: I have notified Facebook Counsel that I will be filing a First Amended Complaint today and a Motion for Limited Injunctive Relief this week for Defamation and Invasion of Privacy.
“I’m glad the Court of Appeals recognized that” and chose to reclassify its memorandum decision as a published opinion, Spencer said in a phone interview. While Spencer said he doesn’t use Facebook, he said he believes “defamations occur on Facebook all the time.” 
He said he hopes the COA’s ruling and the subsequent award of damages in Charles’ favor sends a message that “you can’t just say anything you want on Facebook and get personal and make statements about other people that aren’t true without running the possibility of getting sued. “A lay person probably feels they have a First Amendment right to say whatever they want to, but that’s definitely not the case if you’re harming people with what you’re saying,” Spencer said. 
Even though the case was tried before a small claims court where pleading standards are less stringent, Dattilo said he believes he had a winning case in any forum. He said the circumstances of this case made small claims the proper venue. “I still think the facts of this case could have held up anywhere,” he said. “When you get a reversal and a remand for … a damages hearing, you’ve got something on all fours. … You really appreciate having a fact pattern like this that becomes precedent and will probably help the middle class substantially.” 
Coincidentally perhaps, prior to the dawn of the Internet, Plaintiff wrote for the Indianapolis Star immediately prior to admission to, and graduation from, a then top-50 law school, i.e. Case Western Reserve University, where he earned an "A" in Constitutional Law when he studied, under, and clerked for, one Professor Edward Mearns.




 

I reported the first set of racist and defamatory messages to my last girlfriend last summer by a Facebook user identified as Troy Frasier. Facebook refused to identify the perp In spite of the fact that Defamation on Facebook is indeed actionable per Dial v. Hammond 15-CV-05383 N. Carolina Buncombe Superior (2015). Case settled for $500,000.00.
******
Next, direct accusations that I use and abuse and take advantage of gullible white women and that I am allegedly always asking for money were repeated again this year by two user profiles (using the same exact language) were leveled at my current girlfriend. Both of these women are white. The writer(s) claim alternately that they were "burned" by Plaintiff and that they warned 3 other girlfriend who were thankful for the warning. I again approached Facebook and got a canned response: 


Today 
Hi Christopher, We appreciate you taking the time to contact us. You can help your friend or family member by instructing them to report content to us by using the “Report” links located near the content itself. If your friend is blocked from seeing the content, or is not on Facebook, please provide them with a link (URL) to the violating content so that they can include it when they contact us. Please share the following link with you friend to contact us:https://www.facebook.com/help/contact/597132477126770/?ref=cr 

Once we get this information from them, we can review the content and take the appropriate action. View updates from your Support Inbox: https://fb.me/1GKxTo0pkVUrUZO 

Thanks for understanding, 
Riley 
******** 
In response I said: You are playing stupid. Again: I have a VALID CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION ON MY OWN. So you need to give me that goddamn information right now. 

Further: As I told you, the offending Party -- who will be sued -- removed the content so it is no longer available. And the link that you just sent me is not available, see attached. 


So really there is no channel for either my past or current girlfriend to complain anyway. Please advise. And I have sent this content directly to your lawyers too.

********* 
18 April 2019 Re: Ongoing Issues of Defamation on the Facebook “Platform” Vis a vis Christopher King A/K/A KingCast v. Facebook, Inc. 19-CV-1987 

Dear Attorneys Hicks and Thole: 

For reasons noted in today’s communication with the Facebook “Help Desk” I will be adding this information to the pending Federal Complaint against your client, who previously IGNORED my concerns about the exact same sort of Defamation last year. 

This year I can promise you that any and all of the last three (3) girlfriends in my life who were allegedly warned about me by this poster will come forward to state that they were alarmed by this Defamatory Rhetoric and that it did initially have the intended impact: 


It made them leery of me and more accurately feeling vulnerable for prior breaches of trust by OTHER MEN for periods of time ranging from weeks to days to hours. The Rhetoric employed continually references my purportedly predatory acts toward white women, so that is completely racist as well as Defamatory. 

If you do not deliver to me by Close of Business tomorrow 19 April, 2019 a promise to divulge the identifying information on the perpetrators by month’s end I will be folding this matter into the Case at Bar and moving for immediate Injunctive Relief. No one should have to live under this type of racist, defamatory abuse and I will not… nor will any of my past girlfriends or present girlfriend. It’s complete shit. 

In fact, she will send a complaint to Facebook within the next 24 hours and will reply on this email chain immediately to confirm her complete agreement that she is harassed and finds the communication to be Defamatory towards me. And you will note that I am not holding your client responsible for the Defamation as that would of course be outside the purview of 47 USC §230, unlike my pending Claims in the case. 


Now that I have made myself clear, I look forward to hearing from you in the next 24 hours. 


Very Truly Yours,

Christopher King, J.D.

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

A KingCast First Amendment Public Speakers' Warning to Seattle City Council and Debora Juarez.

Back Story.

I am here to tell all of you, and particularly Councilor Juarez that you work for us. And you are in no ways to treat speakers differently based on Content or to interfere with their public comment unless there is a time, place or manner violation. I have seen Council do this to me and to many others and last week in a most despicable manner you did it to a tax-paying public citizen. 

We will revisit this soon but for now watch your step unless you want me to sue you on my behalf or for local licensed Counsel like Lincoln Beauregard to sue you on behalf of someone else. Submitted with all of the respect that is due, I am: 
Christopher King, J.D.

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Attorney KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Von Briesen Attorney Terry L. Johnson Try to Hide his Client's Hateful Attack on Courtroom Journalist.


Here's the long movie. The Second Amended Complaint is here.

Some blue-blood lawyer thinks he walks on fucking air and that he and his client, Mark Rattan, can do and say whatever they want to. Recall that Mark Rattan is the jerk lawyer who grabbed my camera in direct violation of a standing Court Order. Well the Office of Lawyer Responsibility let him off with only a Diversion program and they gave the subject of my video coverage 2 years' suspension because she has the nerve to fight unscrupulous banks who illegally foreclose. 

Attorney Wendy Alison Nora and I have sued the State of Wisconsin and the related attorneys under RICO and Acting Under Color of Law to deprive us of First Amendment Rights. In this particular instance Attorney Johnson is trying to keep me from asking the Court to take Judicial Notice of the findings of the OLR as to how his client "Approached King in an angry and threatening manner."

However from my filing today:

III. Judicial Notice May be Taken at any Time

Should the Court deny the other aspects of Plaintiff King’s Memorandum then Plaintiff King Respectfully requests that the Court consider solely the OLR document in and of itself. In point of fact, Wisconsin Law provides that Judicial Notice may be taken at any time and is in fact MANADATORY in this instance: 

902.01 (4) WHEN MANDATORY. A judge or court shall take judicial notice if requested by a party and supplied with the necessary information. 


*********

Sunday, January 27, 2019

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Observe Seattle Foreclosure Attorney Jill Smith Join Richard Jones in the Client Hall of Shame.

Well ain't that special?
After Plaintiff Erickson and a licensed Private Investigator tried for WEEKS 
to get Defendant Smith to respond -- even checking local hospitals for her and emailing...
She finally has someone accept Service of Process to avoid Default Judgment. 
That's mighty white of her.
Wow. Jill Smith is evading Service at this point in the opinion of a veteran investigator and process server. That's pretty ballsy conduct from an Attorney who still owes her client a shit-ton of money, right?  Talk about hubris. Talk about insouciance, just, wow. God it pains me to do this but she gets no favors from me even though I feel she's getting railroaded. They are separate issues.

I'll say this up front:  I have little to no doubt that Jill Smith is being railroaded by the Washington State Bar Association as far as her pending (allegedly imminent) Bar Suspension. 

I cannot confirm the duration of any alleged suspension but I have it on Good Faith by at least one of her clients and others that she's getting her ticket pulled for a term of at least a year.

I know the pain of a bullshit bar prosecution. I now how the Bar persecutes lawyers who challenge the establishment, especially when the banksters are involved. The only time I was found to have filed a frivolous Complaint in my lifetime involved a complaint when I sued my IOLTA bank for sex discrimination because of how they screwed with my client during her pregnancy and did everything they could NOT to accommodate her.

Judge David E. Cain was a Judge whom I remember seeing about town and he was going to work with me to get me in speaking events and all sorts of things like that. But when I sued that bank he turned around and slapped my black ass with the $5K fine and said it was ridiculous because Bethany's boss was a woman so it couldn't possibly be sex discrimination.

Everyone and their mother knows that is hardly a dispositive thing but he made it into one, and he allowed the Defendant, by and through one Robert Eblin, to file a gerrymandered Deposition in which she said "I wouldn't have a case" in response to a hypothetical question by him. The whole thing was complete shit, just as the whole thing about Scott Stafne was bullshit, the whole thing against Wendy Alison Nora is bullshit (I'm a co-plaintiff in her lawsuit against the State of Wisconsin and the Supreme Court and Office of Lawyer Regulation) and the whole thing against Attorney Smith is probably bullshit too. Eblin has probably retired as I don't see him as a listed attorney in the past year or so and he was a partner at Bailey Cavalieri so he's probably set. He can keep his blood money and his bullshit victories. That's why he aged so poorly since last I saw him in '99 or so. Shit I fucking look great. That's what good clean honest living will do for you. Elbin is only 2 years older than me.


Here's the rub: Not one of my issues ever involved client dissatisfaction of failure to perform or failure to return monies. Not. One. But Jill has this issue before her with at least one client, Shelley Erickson. Ms. Erickson and I go back a long way since I moved here and we along with Karen Pooley and many others were responsible for trying to make Seattle City Council sue MERS as many other government entities have done throughout the Country, including right next door in Multnomah County (Portland) and 11 other Oregon Counties. 

Anyway Attorney Smith acknowledged the debt but still has not sent any money, not even partial payment, so WTF???  Further, Ms. Erickson and I have tried to get any kind of itemized statement we could from Attorney Smith and we have failed resolutely. Smith says it was a flat rate case. I basically said to her that's bullshit. Provide proof of the hours you put in because it doesn't matter under Contract you still have to show what you did to deserve hanging on to the money and I don't believe she did much of anything, so that's sad. 

Compound that sadness with the fact that Attorney Smith does I believe have a life-impacting brain condition. I am more than sensitive to that as noted by my Reflection on my mother last month. 

But she still owes her client the money dammit. Notwithstanding that, I commented to this hateful blogger who is on a rant against Neil Garfield and Jill Smith: I basically said dude you're flat fucking WRONG because 3 year SOL does not compute in WA State anymore because Hoang holds that it's 6 years, not three. Let's see if he actually publishes my admonishment. 

1 Feb 2019 Upate: He did, and I'm wrong actually. We had a good vibe chat: 

Interesting. At first blush, I’d say the 9th Circuit flouted the express language of 15 USC 1640(e) which provides 1 year limit on offensive actions for violation of 15 USC 1635(f). However, reading the Huang v BOA opinion I see that Hoang demanded relief for contract violation under the Washington State Consumer Protection Act, and Washington State provides a 6 year limit for contract breach actions. So the opinion makes sense. Had Hoang sued under 15 USC 1640(e), the 9th Circuit would have upheld the dismissal.


Stay tuned. More communication will be posted. The story of how Richard L. Jones screwed Karen Pooley in my opinion is here. I thought he was cool but really I see him now as a smarmy Lincoln Town Car driving bastard.

Also, Melissa Huelsman is a complete asshat too. Just.... the worst. I have no idea how her AVVO rating is so high when I know so many rational people who have been through the wringer with her. 

Sunday, December 30, 2018

KingCast, Mortgage Movies and How to Sue Facebook Say "Happy Anniversary Pepper!"

Pepper Underfoot the Australian Cattle Dog came into my life on 30 December 2016 the day after our baby Livi the Wonderdog was murdered by an idiot at what we discovered to be an illegal kennel. We fled our East Coast vacation and flew back to Seattle and, on a lark, decided to check NOAH for a suitable dog to join our family of Elisa, Fang Weatherwax and me at the time. 

Life after Livi still remains painful at times. There's no two ways about it, litigation and other results notwithstanding. But Baby Pepper is such a joy to have around each and every day that I just can't love her enough. On a good day she gives me the same LOL.

You had Big Paws to fill Pepper, and you do it with class and distinction each and every day. I know Livi loves you honey.

-Dad.

Thursday, December 20, 2018

KingCast and Mortgage Movies: Second Amended Complaint in Nora, King and Rinaldi v. State of Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation and Wisconsin Supreme Court.



The Second Amended Complaint is down at bottom. First check out my Reply Brief as to Defendant Stephanie L. Dykeman evading service. Yah the Process Server got to her house, car in driveway, lights on, purse on table and then deadly silence after he knocks on the door. This from a distinguished very white member of the bar, nice. But that's a Wells Fargo Attorney for ya. When they're not shoving your camera around (Mark Rattan) or calling someone a nigger (Drug-snorting Howard Apgar, Esq phone interview) they are evading Service of Process. 

Stephanie L. Dyke by the way definitely lied about how she could ascertain that Defendant Rattan's hand never touched mine from across the room when we are both claiming dibs on a camera that is 3" long. Yep.  It's all disgusting but true.




The original journal entry from 23 March, 2017.
Since that time the OLR has punished Attorney Nora and called her a threat to Law
Whilst giving Attorney Mark Rattan a slap on the wrist and "diversion plan"
for attacking a professional videographer who was following all of the rules of Court.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmYatdpIlSU (edited with background)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nJ7XjK37C4 (raw video part one -- setting the rules)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4_E3X_E9yo (raw video part two -- the attack)
http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2017/03/kingcast-and-mortgage-movies-see-rude.html

Take time and watch these videos of Wells Fargo Attorney Mark Rattan attacking me when I was minding my business lawfully recording a Court Hearing. The Hearing was in my opinion part of a dog'n'pony show for yet anther run at attorneys who defend homeowners against wrongful foreclosure; it is happening all over America.  As a former residential closing attorney  I founded Mortgage Movies Journal with hundreds of Court and court-related videos over the past eight years to document the issues.


This is a lawsuit that alleges criminal racketeering on the part of the entire legal establishment in Wisconsin, MN. The allegations are that these entities are basically driven by the whimsy of the bankster attorneys because the Bar Association/Office of Lawyer Regulation never investigate fraudulent conduct on the part of the bank attorneys and selectively target homeowner attorneys and independent journalists who get in their way because we threaten to expose mass corruption.


By the way, you might think that the Wisconsin Association of African-American Lawyers would be interested in this one, right?  I've won Civil Rights trials when I practiced and I got this white guy attacking me to cover up abuse of a Civil Rights-minded white female attorney in Wendy Alison Nora, right?

Negative. He told me to get the hell outta town and that he was "worse" than Mark Rattan's lawyer Terry Johnson, his former boss at Von Briesen. Don't believe me? Read the emails but remember this: His new boss Dana Sachs I support waaaay over Scott Walker, because Scott Walker and that Judge Juan B. Colas support fraudulent banisters 24/7. Maybe Dana can use my video right?

Now we see the back story as to why I got booted out of that hearing: Because I cover corruption like no one else in the Country, with cameras in courtrooms 24/7 that's why.