Housing is a Civil Right

Housing is a Civil Right
mortgagemovies007@gmail.com

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

KingCast Says NAACP ACLU ADL and Urban League Must Help Black Boeing Mechanic Victimized by Racism and Defamation.

Judge Laurel Gibson should be calling for an investigation into the conduct of her peer, Judge Michael Scott for reasons that I am about to explain.

See that nervous smiled from Attorney Christina Becia. She’s with the law firm of Bradley Wolf and they are  representing Grecia Luke, a white woman who lied under Oath about never being a Real Estate Broker and has been involved in many lawsuits as a Defendant, including a couple of foreclosures.

Luke was in a rent to own deal at her Wedgewood Condominium Unit 242 with Sir Fredrick McAfee, a black former Boeing aerospace mechanic who had already purchased unit 303 himself in cash some years earlier.

Unbeknownst to Sir Fredrick the management company had an ulterior motive to get rid of him and they began spreading false rumors that he was involved in prostitution at his unit. This is stereotypical racial profiling folks and it’s as ugly as you can get. You can infer the ulterior motives by this email that Contractor Joe Hellstern got from the management and shared with Sir Fredrick and me, and Mr. Hellstern will testify to more about how dirty and under-handed these people are under Oath.

So basically Luke backed out of the deal at Unit 242 so Fredrick took the Lessor over to his unit and along with it came the Trust money that Luke was no longer entitled to.

There were checks issued by Sir Fredrick to Grecia Luke that she cashed in early 2017 yet these monies did not make it to her mortgagee bank. Sir Fredrick had no control over that but something shady was definitely going on.

Then somehow Luke files a Fraud case against him and his lawyer fails to file a Counterclaim after promising him he would do so. Sir Fredrick tries the case himself against these two lawyers and when he loses on one count they sock him for attorney fees and even take his own property Unit 303 from him.

When he requests Immediate Rule 59 Review to set aside the Bench Verdict   Attorney Wolf draws up a proposed Order that the Court rubber-stamps, falsely claiming that Sir Fredrick did not timely file his Motion until after 4:30. But you can see right there that he DID timely file his motion at 3:52 so that is all just crazy-making and that is an Ethics violation to boot.

And to top it off, Judge Gibson and her daughter were great friends with Sir Fredrick until all of this happened. She even lived with Sir Fredrick for a time when her home needed repairs but all of that changed once these people assassinated his character and ruined him financially. This is a man who already suffered through years of racial discrimination and underpaid disability checks at Boeing mind you.

********

Now he has filed a Defamation and Tortious Interference lawsuit against these people and the NAACP, The Urban League, the ACLU and ADL must help him.


Because Justice Delayed is Justice Denied.

NAACP, ADL, ACLU and URBAN ... by on Scribd

Friday, June 14, 2019

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Say "Oh Come Now Mike Roseberg.... or Better Yet, Don't."


Hahahaaa... I had always said Seattle Times Mike Roseberg was an ass for failing to cover anything about MERS or my lawsuit as to why the City never sued MERS as did so many Counties in Oregon. Well there you go, folks, Talking Points Memo reports that he has now basically been sacked for sexual harassment, just goes to show: 
"The Times suspended Rosenberg over a month ago after freelance journalist Talia Jane posted screenshots of several Twitter messages he’d sent her, including one that said “there is so much cum on your face.” 
Son let me tell you sumpthin' you need to be very very careful before you even think about saying anything like that to someone you are not already intimate with. Just call it a KingCast helpful pointer. So you got kinda sacked. Not like, ball-sacked as you are probably thinking with respect to unwitting recipient of your advances, but sacked as in you basically got fired-sacked.
Must every inquiry into sexual misconduct be a probe I wonder.

Unfortunately the Times will still likely continue to ignore the issue but at least now I have an entry to them: "Say you guys you might want to consider what I have to say.... I would hate to impugn Reporter Roseberg's integrity, but...... he does look kinda creepy..."  

Related: Whack-a-Mole, Seattle's festering homeless problem. 

Saturday, June 1, 2019

Whack-a-Mole: Homeless in Seattle 2019.


Note: No innocent moles were injured in the production of this video. However, I sure to wish I could give Seattle City Council a few love taps on the head with a rubber mallet. It might bump start them off of TDC and make them do things that actually make sense, like being transparent or suing MERS like all the dozen Counties have done in Oregon and in many States to the East.

By the way guys, you can try to restrict speech and public comment at your meetings all you like. It's doesn't make you any less wrong.

Gone today. Back somewhere else tomorrow.


Monday, May 13, 2019

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: Ten Points of Light for Seattle City Council on the Homeless.


Note: I tweeted this @Seattle PD and @KUOW. The major and so-called alternative press will continue to ignore me even though I said "You Suck" just as did so many LE. 
Read the story.

1. I remember the day I trusted the press in this town and you on crime and homelessness and helping Seattle homeowners. 

2. Nick Licata and Kshama Sawant acknowledged the bank's criminal activity against homeowners and I made videos for her first campaign, for free. 

3. I made a video with Mike O'Brien and the man who got his ear bitten off. I thought it was an anomaly. It was not. 


4. Some of you and other candidates attended a forum I co-hosted with Michelle Darnell and SAFE about helping homeowners on mortgages because I was a closing attorney; I ran a title company and Michelle is one helluva paralegal. We worked on homeowner mediations together. I thought you cared. 


5. Then there was this Ed Murray. 

Tim Burgess: The slimiest politician I have ever known.

6. Well since then you ignored your own paid consultant about suing Mortgage Electronic Registration Services and Tim Burgess the slimiest politician I've ever met -- summarily shut her down even though Counties in oregon have successfully sued MERS. And I leaked the Audit when you were slow to produce it. And I successfully sued you to get the documents as to why you didn't sue MERS and all I get is a bunch of redactions. 


7. And the homeless problem continues unabated with homeless folks being shuffled around town right back to the same spots while many of them are either being abused and used for money or committing crimes themselves. 


8. And you have no clue or plan about what to do whatsoever. Everywhere we go we are under siege in this town and you are completely feckless. 

9. There is a homeless bloke named Lucky, he's behind the Lowes at 130th near Aurora. He is being hassled by City contractors. Call off the dogs folks. He's about the only Good Thing in that area, keeping things clean and running out the riffraff. 


10. You folks in TV land just google Mortgage Movies Journal or I am KingCast on Facebook URL or Christopher King watch everything I just told you because Major press and what passes for alternative press in this town certainly won't take you where I will. I know this because I used to work for major press.


Respectfully submitted and just doing the work my Momma loved me to do, _______________________________
Christopher King, J.D.
Mortgagemovies007@gmail.com

Friday, April 19, 2019

Will Keker Van Nest Lawyers Defend Facebook Racist and Defamatory Messages Sent to Plaintiff King's Girlfriends?

As to the Proposed ORDER: IDK... Just my $.02 but it makes sense, right?
Regardless of how much the Internet mafia hates my black ass, they know I'm CORRECT.
And you had better believe there is an Internet mafia.
That's OK. I've got other resources they don't even know about. But they will.

I told the Deputy Legal Director of the #ACLU, who has recently tweeted supporting the Facebook law firm. No way can she support their position if they refuse to provide the information. That's foul. Slander per se this is. Conduct involving moral turpitude.
You better believe I know my First Amendment-relate Law folks. 
Like the back of my hand. They are DONE. I can't wait to get before Judge Orrick.
I am chomping at the bit. They.... are not. I guarantee you this.
Then FB banning all of my blog pages as being in violation of community standards?
Momma, this one's for you honey. I got this.

Yep. I sure do
See Zerlie Charles v. Vickie D. Vest, Indiana Ct. App. No. 72A01-1706-SC-01252 (October 24, 2017) and Dial v. Hammond 15-CV-05383 N. Carolina Buncombe Superior (2015). Case settled for $500,000.00.  
                                                                         *********
65. In spite of all of this, Defendant allowed Defamatory remarks to be published to Plaintiff’s last girlfriend “MH” in 2018 without recourse from Facebook User “Troy.” When Plaintiff asked Defendant for the identity of the poster Facebook directed the attention away to Plaintiff’s girlfriend. 

66. In 2019 Defendant and Counsel in this case again allowed such Defamatory remarks to be leveled against Plaintiff towards his current girlfriend “SW” by two Facebook accounts “Facebook User” and “Lisa Marie” 

67. The comments in 2018 and in 2019 all indicate, with certainty devoid of any speculation, that Plaintiff “cheats on all of his women” and "Every single woman that he as dated he has used and mentally abused."…. and goes on to state that Plaintiff seeks out white women as gullible, to use for money etc. etc. ad nauseam, basically every negative racist stereotype of black men in this Fine Country. (See Appendix ______). 

68. Plaintiff and “SW” attempted to exhaust all administrative appeals within the Platform structure and Facebook continued to ignore Plaintiff’s Defamation issue and offered a link for “SW” to use that was, and is, nonfunctional. 

69. As such, Plaintiff responded: You are playing stupid. Again: I have a VALID CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION ON MY OWN. So you need to give me that goddamn information right now.....

*********  
Dear Attorney Spencer: I have notified Facebook Counsel that I will be filing a First Amended Complaint today and a Motion for Limited Injunctive Relief this week for Defamation and Invasion of Privacy.
“I’m glad the Court of Appeals recognized that” and chose to reclassify its memorandum decision as a published opinion, Spencer said in a phone interview. While Spencer said he doesn’t use Facebook, he said he believes “defamations occur on Facebook all the time.” 
He said he hopes the COA’s ruling and the subsequent award of damages in Charles’ favor sends a message that “you can’t just say anything you want on Facebook and get personal and make statements about other people that aren’t true without running the possibility of getting sued. “A lay person probably feels they have a First Amendment right to say whatever they want to, but that’s definitely not the case if you’re harming people with what you’re saying,” Spencer said. 
Even though the case was tried before a small claims court where pleading standards are less stringent, Dattilo said he believes he had a winning case in any forum. He said the circumstances of this case made small claims the proper venue. “I still think the facts of this case could have held up anywhere,” he said. “When you get a reversal and a remand for … a damages hearing, you’ve got something on all fours. … You really appreciate having a fact pattern like this that becomes precedent and will probably help the middle class substantially.” 
Coincidentally perhaps, prior to the dawn of the Internet, Plaintiff wrote for the Indianapolis Star immediately prior to admission to, and graduation from, a then top-50 law school, i.e. Case Western Reserve University, where he earned an "A" in Constitutional Law when he studied, under, and clerked for, one Professor Edward Mearns.




 

I reported the first set of racist and defamatory messages to my last girlfriend last summer by a Facebook user identified as Troy Frasier. Facebook refused to identify the perp In spite of the fact that Defamation on Facebook is indeed actionable per Dial v. Hammond 15-CV-05383 N. Carolina Buncombe Superior (2015). Case settled for $500,000.00.
******
Next, direct accusations that I use and abuse and take advantage of gullible white women and that I am allegedly always asking for money were repeated again this year by two user profiles (using the same exact language) were leveled at my current girlfriend. Both of these women are white. The writer(s) claim alternately that they were "burned" by Plaintiff and that they warned 3 other girlfriend who were thankful for the warning. I again approached Facebook and got a canned response: 


Today 
Hi Christopher, We appreciate you taking the time to contact us. You can help your friend or family member by instructing them to report content to us by using the “Report” links located near the content itself. If your friend is blocked from seeing the content, or is not on Facebook, please provide them with a link (URL) to the violating content so that they can include it when they contact us. Please share the following link with you friend to contact us:https://www.facebook.com/help/contact/597132477126770/?ref=cr 

Once we get this information from them, we can review the content and take the appropriate action. View updates from your Support Inbox: https://fb.me/1GKxTo0pkVUrUZO 

Thanks for understanding, 
Riley 
******** 
In response I said: You are playing stupid. Again: I have a VALID CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION ON MY OWN. So you need to give me that goddamn information right now. 

Further: As I told you, the offending Party -- who will be sued -- removed the content so it is no longer available. And the link that you just sent me is not available, see attached. 


So really there is no channel for either my past or current girlfriend to complain anyway. Please advise. And I have sent this content directly to your lawyers too.

********* 
18 April 2019 Re: Ongoing Issues of Defamation on the Facebook “Platform” Vis a vis Christopher King A/K/A KingCast v. Facebook, Inc. 19-CV-1987 

Dear Attorneys Hicks and Thole: 

For reasons noted in today’s communication with the Facebook “Help Desk” I will be adding this information to the pending Federal Complaint against your client, who previously IGNORED my concerns about the exact same sort of Defamation last year. 

This year I can promise you that any and all of the last three (3) girlfriends in my life who were allegedly warned about me by this poster will come forward to state that they were alarmed by this Defamatory Rhetoric and that it did initially have the intended impact: 


It made them leery of me and more accurately feeling vulnerable for prior breaches of trust by OTHER MEN for periods of time ranging from weeks to days to hours. The Rhetoric employed continually references my purportedly predatory acts toward white women, so that is completely racist as well as Defamatory. 

If you do not deliver to me by Close of Business tomorrow 19 April, 2019 a promise to divulge the identifying information on the perpetrators by month’s end I will be folding this matter into the Case at Bar and moving for immediate Injunctive Relief. No one should have to live under this type of racist, defamatory abuse and I will not… nor will any of my past girlfriends or present girlfriend. It’s complete shit. 

In fact, she will send a complaint to Facebook within the next 24 hours and will reply on this email chain immediately to confirm her complete agreement that she is harassed and finds the communication to be Defamatory towards me. And you will note that I am not holding your client responsible for the Defamation as that would of course be outside the purview of 47 USC §230, unlike my pending Claims in the case. 


Now that I have made myself clear, I look forward to hearing from you in the next 24 hours. 


Very Truly Yours,

Christopher King, J.D.

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

A KingCast First Amendment Public Speakers' Warning to Seattle City Council and Debora Juarez.

Back Story.

I am here to tell all of you, and particularly Councilor Juarez that you work for us. And you are in no ways to treat speakers differently based on Content or to interfere with their public comment unless there is a time, place or manner violation. I have seen Council do this to me and to many others and last week in a most despicable manner you did it to a tax-paying public citizen. 

We will revisit this soon but for now watch your step unless you want me to sue you on my behalf or for local licensed Counsel like Lincoln Beauregard to sue you on behalf of someone else. Submitted with all of the respect that is due, I am: 
Christopher King, J.D.

Tuesday, March 5, 2019