Housing is a Civil Right

Housing is a Civil Right

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Wisconsin Bar Set to Slam White Wells Fargo Lawyer who Attacked Black Journalist.

Like I said Bubba: Put your finger down. Sit down. 
And keep your fucking hands off of my equipment and me.
Period. Ya fuckin' knob-jockey.


As you can see by the 6 March 2018 letter from the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation (hereinafter, "OLR,") the handwriting is finally on the wall in a heinous disciplinary action.  Mark Rattan -- that pompous asshole who put his hands on my equipment and me while I was lawfully running video in Referee James J. Winiarski's hearing is going to receive public discipline on his record, as well he should. Wait until I get done suing his ass too. All in due course. These people need to learn a lesson, and I am just the person to teach it to them.

A detractor of mine once said to me, 

"You can't make your life just suing people who don't suit you." 

To that I say: 

"I don't just sue people who don't suit me. As a progressive black man in this Country who has actually won Civil Rights trials I would have about eleventy-billion lawsuits filed against people if I were that reactionary, LOL fool.  That being said, however, I reserve the right to sue anyone who actually violates my fundamental rights, or those of my people. Further, I will do it in a heartbeat and I will do it with a vengeance." 

Now then, it is indeed refreshing to note that Mark W. Rattan, the sanctimonious, bigoted, hegemonic, nouveau riche Wells Fargo attorney who assaulted me (raw video) at the Wendy Alison Nora OLR disciplinary witch-hunt hearing a year ago will be sanctioned.

His lawyer Terry E. johnson should also be sanctioned for failure to sign pleadings. I proved that too, but let's see what happens to this cheeseball who was clearly brought in to the picture for his influence because he sits on an OLR Committee.... he even tried to say that I altered the video. Jesus Christ on a Bicycle dude, grow up.

I’m sure his new law firm (vonBriesen) is “having fun” with this… Terry recently told me to "have fun" too, so I want to be sure that he and his people are "having fun," as well, as I finish whupping his fucking arrogant ass, quite publicly. 

Or did I?  It's so hard to understand, what with him not actually signing any Pleadings and such, so how can I beat someone who never signed any Pleadings, LOL.

What a hot mess, right?

So anyway KingCast was again correct about ethical violations committed by an establishment Judge or lawyer. Remember this: I am always correct. Theese white men of privilege harm many people, all the time. Often is is their own white women who catch it the worst -- I know it 'cos they tell me --  but that's a topic of discussion for another day, yah.

For now let's just finish the ass-whupping I started.

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

KingCast Sees Old Pals Federal Judge Ronald B. Leighton & Zurich Insurance Attorney Lesley J. Fleming Caught on Ethics Probe.

U.S. Department of Justice following KingCast to see how dirty Judge Ronald B. Leighton and Lesley J. Fleming really are. Or are they following to see if they can shut me down.

Silly Judge. He can't hide from KingCast and the U.S. House and Senate. 

 Bozgoz v. Essakhi et al Judge Leighton corrupt and protecting his former intern Lesley J. Fleming and Zurich Insurance. All of them are completely corrupt and violating the ADA to boot. Not to mention Conflict of Laws because I have personally filed on behalf of an infirm person with a PoA. See my successful Motion to Intervene in Shafer v. Bremby, 3:12-CV-00039 (CT 2012).

Now of course the Court allowed Defendant Bremby and the white CT AG to lie through their teeth and throw us out of Court, but at least we got to play. Here they don’t even bother with the pretense. Prejudiced…. hell yes. That’s about the only thing the Court got accurate and True.
Get this, Judge Ronald B. Leighton is wrong on the Law, fancy that. A Power of Attorney for an infirm person has a right to Represent. How do I know for sure? Read my fucking email above as POA for my Mom. 

Leighton is in violation of the general rules and principles of informed consent…. he and Zurich Attorney Lesley J. Fleming know full well that she was his goddamn clerk and 13 years ago is hardly a lifetime. It should have been disclosed. And that is in violation of the State law on Appearance of Impropriety too. This dude is a Piece of Work. 

Judge Leighton also glossed over the fact that he was Attorney Fleming’s direct boss. “She worked in the Courthouse 13 years ago.” Motion for Reconsideration and Appeal on Conflict of Laws, I say. Just my opinion.

6 March 2018 Update--Zurich and their sleaze ball friends 
at Pierce County are back for another visit.

Love me some Roger Federer.... GOAT, no doubt. No offense to Laver or Tilden but Jesus Roger is a god.  Watch the Wimbledon drop shot at 4:41. Wuuut?  Hate me some Zurich Insurance though, yes. Now if you'll excuse me I have some Notices to prepare for dozens of elected officials, especially those on the Justice Committees. 

KingCast Mortgage Movies see Zurich Insurance checking in on their investment in crime with Judge Ronald B. Leighton and Lesley J. Fleming 

Get your background here.
As noted, Pierce County Judge Stanley Rumbaugh ran roughshod over the Constitution, Free Press and Civil Rights laws and principles on two (2) distinct cases I started following a year or so ago. In one of them he screwed a family after their matriarch sustained a broken neck because of a contracted Pierce County driver. 

The family -- by and through a PTSD military-background advocate -- noted collusion in the case and filed a RICO Action in the Seattle Federal District Court to escape the oppression coming from the dirtiest County in the State, right. 

But alas, the hillbilly Justice mavens manifest this time through Judge Ronald B. Leighton, who has abused his discretion in recent history by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. This guy went and cherry-picked the case and brought it right back down to his home turf where he basically stomped it out and dismissed the entire thing, taking not to give her leave to amend, because that's where he fucked up in Sheidler v. Avery, 599 Fed.Appx. 688 (2015). 
He did this because Zurich defense Counsel Lesley Fleming is an old friend of his, a former law clerk. The same Lesley Fleming who wagged her finger in my face as noted in the video, right. The two of them have some nerve, and they almost got away clean. But not quite. This is going to leave a mark, and multiple people will be filing Ethics Complaints on both of them. From Sheidler:
"However, the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the first amended complaint without leave to amend. See U.S. v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2011) (“[D]ismissal without leave to amend is improper unless it is clear, upon de novo review, that the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). See Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir.2012) (“A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 
We therefore reverse and remand to allow Scheidler an opportunity to amend his complaint. Moreover, the district court did not address the merits of Scheidler's petition for review of the Board of Tax Appeal's September 6, 2012 decision, which Scheidler incorporated by reference into his amended complaint. Nor did the district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. See City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 168–69, 118 S.Ct. 523, 139 L.Ed.2d 525 (1997) (supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 extends to review of state administrative agency determinations). We therefore reverse *690 and remand for review of the agency decision." 
 .....Anyway, in this case for them to have the nerve to run a game like that, and nearly get away clean, is just a study in abject horror. The funny part of course is that in her research about incestuous deals like this where the appearance of impropriety has been shattered, Ms. Bozgoz found the forced recusal of one Landa B. McCafferty that I caused on a First Amendment case several years ago as noted in the video. I had sued Kelly Ayotte during her ascension to her one-term as U.S. Senator because she threw me out of a publicly-advertised fundraiser that was clearly a public event.  On-duty regular Nashua, NH PD were there to cover it -- not Detail cops on private time, right, duh.

Anyway McCafferty worked underneath my opposing Counsel Jack Middleton, I discovered. And so did Senator Ayotte, I discovered. But much like the litigants in this case, I only discovered it after I was fucked, and the Court basically laughs at you because that's what they are designed to do. Screw little people 85% of the time, give them a break every now and then to create the appearance of a Just and Civilized Society. 

Don't believe the hype. These people are sick. Basically, robed criminals. Stay tuned for Pt.2 where we learn more about Attorney Flemings conduct in this case. It's a doozy and got her removed from the case, but that was just damage control.  I'm about to blow the cover on that, too.

KingCast v. McCafferty Video.
KingCast v. McCafferty Motion to Recuse.

Friday, January 26, 2018

KingCast Discusses Like Kenney, Corporal Bruce McKay and Multiple Felon Greg Floyd on "Missing Maura Murray" Podcast.

In this episode Lance Reenstierna & Tim Pilleri talk to Christopher King of Chris King's First Amendment Page. Topics include the triangle of fate between Office Bruce McKay, 24 year old Liko Kenney and neighbor Greg Floyd and how it could relate to Maura Murray's disappearance 

Note: Not a mortgage but important enough for me to cross post it here from my personal journal page.

"Like talking to a tornado!"
"Chris King is a ball of energy"
"Videos like an episode of Law and Order."
 -- Lance & Tim.

The best story on this is from ABC News. Hats off to Lance Reenstierna and Tim Pilleri for the excellent series and for Errin Larkin for putting us together after all these years. Be sure to join me in future episodes on their other channel.

Enjoy the interview. It is highly disturbing, however, and quite graphic. Because that's how life is.

The Franconia shooting tragedy summary video I made a few years ago is proof of that. So too is the most obvious deficiency in the "investigation" of this case, the failure to analyze this windshield bullet as well as Bruce McKay's conduct before and throughout the last moments of his life, when he was busy violating all matter of clearly-established Protocol.

Anyway, it's sad that some LE ruin it for others, because they already have the toughest job in the World, but when you hurt people with intention, time and time again, I will indeed join the community and make certain that you never get a road named after you:  Because you weren't so much killed in the line of duty as much as you were killed using your badge as a tool of misogynist (Ms. B Affidavit requesting psychological testing) and otherwise hateful hegemony to terrify innocent men, women and children, and that's a fact. 

Audio -- Bruce McKay Highway House Hearing #1: Rejected.
Video -- Bruce McKay Highway Senate Hearing #2: Rejected.

Thursday, January 25, 2018

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Vietnam Veteran Force Washington Department of Commerce to Reopen a Bad Faith Mediation with SLS and QLSC.

KingCast Mortgage Movies Michael Dean Levitz v. MERS and Capital One Preliminary Injunction CH 11 Adversary... by Christopher King on Scribd

Below see how the Department lies. Read the Description of these lies within the Description of the Memo itself. They even go so far as to say I did not provide them a full copy of Attorney Anderson's letter, yet there it is, plain as day, right fucking there. Have they no shame?  I'll bring some shame to them though. Stick around.

DFI joins in on the State-Sponsored Gang Bang of Vietnam Veteran Michael D. Levitz. No consent and no grease.

Good Day to All,

I have reviewed the non-response of the DFI as printed below.

As a former Assistant State Attorney (and residential closing attorney) I cannot condone you deferring to the Bankruptcy Court. As specifically noted on prior occasion and in the Complaint to the Attorney General (himself a blow-hard when it comes to really enforcing the law) the DFI already has taken a stance on this, in Planet Home Lending. You found that MERS' conduct, which is identical to its conduct herein, constituted a False and Deceptive Practice, but when Mr. Levitz showed you the exact same (or worse) fact pattern in his case you take and run off like a puppy that peed itself. Shameful.

Your mission is to "provide regulatory oversight" dammit:

Mr. Levitz' mission, and the ambit of authority with respect to the Bankruptcy case does not reach that far.

You are ignoring your own case law. There is no real support for homeowners in this State, and I am about to document it thoroughly.

But what do I know. I was only a closing attorney who make WaMu a few million dollars Bank in the Day.

Very Truly Yours,



Mr. Levitz:

I received your voicemail asking for a status update on DFI Complaint No. 048467. Recently, we sent you a letter notifying you that we received your complaint from the Washington State Attorney General’s Office and, upon review, determined that this matter is in pending litigation in US Bankruptcy Court. As noted in that letter, we will refrain from taking action on this matter pending the outcome of that litigation. At this time, there are no additional updates.


Drew Stillman
Financial Legal Examiner | Consumer Services Division | Department of Financial Institutions

P 360.902.8792 | F 360.704.6953 | E drew.stillman@dfi.wa.gov | PO Box 41200 | Olympia, WA 98504-1200


Want to know the meaning of Hell on Earth? Ask Michael Levitz, dealing with Quality Loan Servicing, McCarthy Holthus and Specialized Loan Servicing. Here is your back story one and two, as the Christmas Grinch story continues. In this chapter we examine a clear-cut violation of established protocol that resulted in a homeowner having to force the Department of Commerce to reopen an improvidently-Certified Mediation because of a Mediator's oversight and post-hoc Bad Faith on the part of Specialized Loan Servicing.
There was an agreement, and they reneged on the agreement so they can try to steal a Seattle home with Sound and Mountain views. It's despicable conduct, particularly in light of the fact that the Trusts involved either don't exist or are not registered, and because he tried to pay off this loan already but could not find his lender. You can't make this up.

But as Gordon Gano reminds us in lyric verse, "they do it all the time."

Monday, January 22, 2018

KingCast Drops the Hammer and Exposes Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, Rose Adams, Ginger's Rescue and AC Officers Tabatha Shoemake and Elena McKee as Architects of Danger.

Note: Not a mortgage but important enough to cross post from my personal journal.

On Jan 22, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Christopher King <kingcast955@icloud.com> wrote:
Re: Rose Adams case shows how dirty Edmonds and MLT really is. 

Criminal Charges.
You let this woman run amok forever and a day for illegitimate reasons. Criminal Charges.
Thank god for KOMO coverage.

You protected her just as you protected and continue to protect Kristina in the death of Livi.

I'm not done with you. 
Far from done.
Fuck you. Fuck each and every one of you. Especially that so-called Attorney (Kristina's hand puppet) Greg Schrag.
-The nigger you love to hate.

************(7:26pm follow up)

So yeah, 

After the Jury deadlocked on her animal cruelty case she brokered a Settlement with the city of Edmonds:

lmao It just hit me. The one thing Rose said that’s true. The dogs are like her children. Truer words have never been said. She treated the dogs just as badly as she treated us. Notice she’s estranged from all four of her children? Hell, the only one that showed up was there to see to it she was convicted. Like her children indeed.

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

KingCast and Kegler Brown's Luis Alcalde Esq. Reflect on MLK Day, Black History Month.

KingCast, Luis Alcalde Esq. Reflect on MLK Day, Black History Month. I take you backwards and forwards over the past 60 years of the Civil Rights movement and 35 of mine to verify that yes indeed, Progress is indeed occurring in Civil Rights... Sort of. 

Starring Yours Truly as "The Johnny Cochran of Columbus."

Co-Starring Minister Donell Muhammad, Jerry L. Doyle (RIP the Columbus legal infrastructure basically murdered him, they are truly evil there), Judge Michael______?, and very nice white lady lawyer Prosecutor (I have babysat her child many years ago) and several rude, ill-mannered and evil white male lawyers. Luis Alcalde is one such man, taking a cheap shot at me in a back hallway one evening after a long Deposition. He is absolutely correct on Cuba/U.S. relations but he's as wrong as could be when it comes to putting his grubby little hands on me for sure.

I believe his firm was repping the scummy Columbus Public School District (remember the Gene Harris "No Confidence" vote LOL) I'm not even sure he was part of the direct Defense team but they hated me because I represented Jerry Doyle and never lost a case with him, including the trial you see here. 

The School Board has false-arrested him for trespassing in this one. I have waited patiently for twenty (20) years to expose this creep in the appropriate Civil Rights context and dare him to a public polygraph test on it. I took both hands to the chest from this guy. That is part of what I bring to a modern-day discussion on racism, class relations, legal and cultural hegemony. 

Are there good corporate defense lawyers in Columbus, Ohio? Sure. John M. Stephen (think: Darrin, Bewitched) is one. He defended Airtouch/Cellular One after they actually made my client Gregory S. Boatwright get back on the phone with someone who called him a nigger. True. I should have included that case in the movie, maybe next time. It was contentious but cordial 24/7 and Gregory and I both thanked him for not being an asshole like some of my opposing Counsel in that little hell hole they call a city.

KingCast: Folks are gonna learn to keep their hands off my equipment and me, right. Jesus Christ on a Bicycle folks. The Beatles/George Harrison, Public Enemy and the Cranberries make musical appearances to carry the Day.  I've got a mouth, I've got the First Amendment and I'm gonna tell it, folks. And my wingspan is about to increase exponentially.

Think about that the next time you go and fuck with someone because you've got more power than them at the moment. It might come back to bite you in the ass. 

I actually have vintage footage of me winning a First Amendment Trial, right. 
Gotta love it.

For updates on this situation and more you can also catch me next week
with my brothers Lance and Tim right here.

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

KingCast & Mortgage Movies Update on Vietnam Veteran Michael Levitz: MERS to Quality/QLSC = No Standing to Foreclose. And Mike Wileman is a robo signer to boot.

KingCast Mortgage Movies Michael Dean Levitz v. MERS and Capital One Preliminary Injunction CH 11 Adversary... by Christopher King on Scribd

2 Feb 2018 -- 
I haven't yet mentioned the Fraudulent LIBOR aspects involved in this case:

When I was a closing attorney we were of course taught that a LIBOR Loan was the Gold Standard. Well we all know what happened to the Gold Standard right LOL... anyway Mr. Levitz can make a way to get a guaranteed injunction pursuant to Deutschebank v. Unitech and hammer these pigs. That's UK Law but how interesting, right?

From Mr. Levitz' Adversary Complaint:
"In addition to matters of rescission, new findings stemming from Barclay’s rigging of LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) (cit.), show Chevy Chase Bank benefitted at the expense of pulling equity away from the Levitz’s home via negative amortization. On top of Moving Party's other claims, it must be noted that LIBOR Litigation is viable, alive and well in the influential Second Circuit governing America's Financial Center of New York. See Generally In Re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation 2016 WL 1301175 (2016). 
18 Jan 2018 -- These rapacious bastards are simply over the top and must be stopped.

Over the next several days I will be producing another video about this entire experience, reflecting on my experiences with the DoC Mediation. I haven't heard back yet regarding my request for interview. If you've got something to say, then say it publicly. I haven't heard anything but the sound of crickets since I offered the Department of Commerce wonk Nathan Peppin a public interview on his position that the Mediator did no wrong. Bullshit. He tried to take me off course when I raised the issue of this Statute being Remedial in nature and the bottom line is that the duty to note the circumstances involved when an NPV test is not conducted is not discretionary: She has to note it to the file:
Transparency. We tried to tell it to Seattle City Council after the taxpayers paid for my colleague Marie McDonnell to do her review of King County & MERS (see the video, below the Mediator review) but they shut it down

Transparency. The government in this case must admit that they blew it. Mr. Levitz did ALL of these things as required on the SLS sale form. I have seen proof of it. These people are full of shit and trying steal a man’s house. And the DoC is complicit because the Mediator should have mentioned this in the comments section relative to the NPV. 

My film students and the lawyer I refer this case to are not going to have it. Mr. Levitz and his son are staying in that house, period. Like I said, ya'll can shape up and Do the Right Thing or I will make you wish that you had. Not a threat. A promise. 

Rocky recall my private correspondence with you. There is Bad Faith screaming from the Mountaintop right here.  And FWIW I tried to play nice with this mediator but I'm done with that shit. Take a look at her lone review, citing "negligence and disdain." Par for the course, folks. Negligence and homeowner abuse is de rigueur around here.


17 January 2018 -- Going forward Attorney Anderson will not be copied on this matter as he has made his position clear in a 16 January 2018 letter I have shared with the Department of Commerce: 

There was an Agreement for Mr. Levitz to sell a parcel of his land. Attorney Anderson and Mr. Levitz and I have amicably resolved our differences relative to any disputes that were referenced in any of my written or video production. We all recognize the none of us are the enemy. We definitely know who the enemies are, however.

Rocky, where is that letter you promised with the Trustee "investigation"
into the myriad issues I raised last week that precipitated the foreclosure postponements?
New video coming tonight, 1 January 2018

Behold the original DoT, above. More on this later, with case law.
Some of that law is referenced in the video.

Everyone is blocking my emails, LOL. You can run but you can't hide.
And you wind up back here reading the journal entry anyway.

Stay tuned for a new movie tonight:
"Seattle Attorneys coddle bloodsucker banks in Vietnam Vet Foreclosure."

Wow we've got a lot going on today with Michael Levitz' Fraudulent MERS/Libor/U.S. Bank foreclosure case. Let's start with the law, then at the end you will see that Ark Legal didn't do jack shit for this man. It was my Complaint to the AG's office that precipitated the postponement of sale. Turns out I missed an email from Rocky McDonald.  

The Law and the documents: Great Morning folks. MERS cannot appoint a Successor Trustee. It’s that simple. Quality has no Standing and there is no Real Party in Interest Manifest. In this case the Assignment is void ab initio because it is all about the entity of MERS, rather than identity of the individual robo-signer, which would render the Assignment merely voidable. Therefore Mr. Levitz may correctly challenge under Yvanova v. New Century 365 P.3d 845 (2016).

How can MERS Assign that which it does not own? And again this Series is not even registered with the SEC When did Mike Wileman work for MERS? He worked for Orion Financial Group 2001-2017. CitiMortgage settled foreclosure Fraud Cases involving Orion documents. Lynn Szymoniak sued Orion as well, on her way to her $18M Settlement. Orion might not have been flagged, but they are dirty too. 

MERS made QLSC Trustee but MERS cannot do this. And the underlying Trust is not registered with the SEC. SMH. 

Lastly, for another recent case involving U.S. Bank and Wrongful Foreclosure and bogus documents: US. Bank v. Mattos 140 Hawaii 26 (June 6, 2017):
With respect to the first issue on certiorari, because it is unclear what Defendants mean by “robo-signing” and because a ruling on the legal effect of “robo-signing” is not necessary to the determination of this case, we set aside the ICA's holding that conclusory assertions that fail to offer factual allegations or a legal theory indicating how alleged **618 *29 “robo-signing” caused harm to a mortgagee are insufficient to establish a defense in a foreclosure action. 
Addressing the factual allegations underlying the “robo-signing” claim, however, we conclude there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Ocwen had the authority to sign the second assignment of mortgage to U.S. Bank. [KingCast says yah, just like with MERS....and Mike Wileman. Knock it off, guys the jig is up, the game is over.] 
With respect to the second issue on certiorari, we affirm the ICA in part. We adopt the majority rule followed by the ICA in U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n v. Salvacion, 134 Hawai‘i 170, 338 P.3d 1185 (App. 2014) and hold that a third party unrelated to a mortgage securitization pooling and servicing agreement lacks standing to enforce an alleged violation of its terms unless the violation renders the mortgage assignment void, rather than voidable, but we limit the holding to the judicial foreclosure context. [Too bad for QLSC that this case involves a Void Assignment, see above] 
Accordingly, we vacate the ICA's March 9, 2016 Judgment on Appeal, as well as the circuit court's August 26, 2014 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Decree of Foreclosure Against All Defendants on Complaint Filed July 21, 2011, and remand this case to the circuit court.
Lastly, there is no explanation for the lack of any explanation as to why a NPV analysis was not conducted in his state-sponsored Mediation under the Fairness in Foreclosure Statute. I know because I've represented homeowners in these. When you walk out of that  door you had better have something sketched out in writing or you're fucked. Who actually trusts a goddamn bank or mortgage company as to what they say they are going to do? 

In this case Mr. Levitz claims there was supposed to be a sale at a negotiated price based on the fact that he could not find a Lender when he tried to pay off his loan in 2009. But instead he claims that they unlawfully dual-tracked him down the road to foreclosure. He was represented by Counsel.  I have inquired of said Counsel as to how and why this could happen. Frankly, I don't give a shit about anybody's feelings here except for those of Mr. Levitz and his family.

Background on the postponement and the punk-assed lawyers at Ark: 

Re: Attorney General Complaint: Levitz | WA-15-688500-SW | Michael Levitz Settlement SLS Account No. 1009602497 
2 hours ago at 2:54 AM 
From Christopher King 
To Robert McDonald 

Dear Rocky: No, I obviously DID NOT see your email from 3 Jan 2018 (seen below) noting the postponement to 9 March 2018 after I had cc'd you on an email Citizen Complaint to the Attorney General's Office on 30 December 2017. I wish I had, then there would have been no need for me to find Ark at the 11th hour and we can all certainly use less acrimony in our Lives. 

There would have been no need for me to document the plight of Mr. Levitz and his family on 5 Jan 2018 in this video.
I did recently see however how Ark Legal is using our correspondence as some sort of Justification for defaulting on its due diligence with respect to Mr. Levitz. I suppose it is a Good Thing they refunded his money because they certainly haven't done anything for him. It seems the triggering event in this postponement was the AG Complaint and nothing that they did. 

Further, I take vehement issue with the musings of Attorney Song as she states: 
"At Ark Law Group, we always strive to be professional in our relationship and communications with our opposing parties to best serve our clients. At this time, we feel that Christopher's communications have put us in a position where we can't advocate for you in the way we believe is best. We will be closing your file today - we recommend you ask Christopher to stop what he's doing as we believe it's hurting your interests in getting the Trustee to work with you." 
 ........ First of all, my communications with the Trustee have zero to do with their representation of Mr. Levitz. If they had desired me to back off as a consumer advocate while Quality commenced active and legitimate settlement negotiations for a change, then of course I would have done so. I've been around dozens of these types of cases either settling mortgages in HAMP negotiations or reporting on them. 

 ...... Second, it is fairly obvious that the Trustee was not trying to work with Mr. Levitz in the first place. By all appearances they were headed straight for foreclosure despite all of the Chain of Title Defects in this case, until I sent the AG Complaint. As such, I have not "hurt" Mr. Levitz' interests at all. 

 .......Lastly, her concern over my deportment given that of Joe McIntosh's Deportment toward me as previously shared.....is ludicrous. 

Be that as it may, I am awaiting an Affidavit from Mr. Levitz regarding the activities at the 2016 Foreclosure Fairness Mediation Conference, where it appears to me that the Law was not followed. He will be adding this to the AG Complaint and again imploring the Trustee and Servicer to trash all of those ridiculous fines, fees and surcharges and to accept a reasonable, stated amount for sale of the main parcel as I understand it. That will zero everything out and terminate this entire thing. 

He should not have to go retain a lawyer to do this but I will continue to seek Counsel for him nonetheless. I've never failed in such an endeavor. I am not about to this time, either. That man has become a brother to me and his son, a nephew. And their puppy a friend of my puppy's. His son is going to fly drones for my videos and teach me how to do it. We're family now. As you know this is not the proverbial deadbeat homeowner guy trying to get a free house. Remember, he tried to PAY OFF the house in the first place but no Lender could be found!