Saturday, May 18, 2013

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Say Witnesses Must Come Forth in Pending Disciplinary Hearing Against Attorneys Burson and McDowell for Foreclosure Acts in Violation of Emergency Rule 14-207.1, Same as Thomas P. Dore!


Remember last week how I showed you where M&T Bank and their lawyer basically hand-picked Judge Mickey Norman to slam a homeowner as Norman completely lied about the reason for Emergency Rule 14-207.1? If you don't well the video is embedded below. He's a real bully and intellectually disingenuous but he can't outsmart me with his lies. Well as a pesky reporter (and former State Attorney and title insurance producer) I am ever so proud to inform you that there's more (including a new video by Monday) coming: 

There's an upcoming trial in Montgomery county (MD) in July for the court to decide whether to disbar or the appropriate level of sanction for John Burson and Matthew McDowell over practices similar to that of T. Dore. Below is the complaint filed by the MD Grievance Commission. MD Griev. Comm's attorney, James Butlok (410-514-7051). Homeowners must demand they participate as witnesses/damaged parties to the practices of Shapiro and Burson and contact whistleblower Jose Portillo and email me at kingjurisdoctor@gmail.com to document the fact that you called. From Paralegal whistleblower Portillo:
*************
The purpose for me reaching out to you is to share upcoming events similar to that of the Thomas Dore case, only this time it deals with attorneys from Shapiro and Burson, another foreclosure attorney in Maryland.  As, you may be already aware (or not), in June 2011, I filed a complaint (attached) with the MD Grievance Commission (MDGC) against attorneys:  William M. Savage, Matthew McDowell and John Burson.  The attorney moving the case is James Botluk (James.Botluk@courts.state.md.us) from MDGC –410-514-7051.

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Baltimore Judge Mickey Norman slams MD Judge of the Year Alan Wilner and lies about Rule 14-207.1 to protect M&T Bank and twice-sanctioned foreclosure mill lawyer Thomas P. Dore.


Back Story:
http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2013/05/kingcast-and-mortgage-movies-watch-hand.html
http://mortgagemovies.blogspot.com/2013/04/kingcast-and-mortgage-movies-present.html

Maryland has the highest per capita rate of foreclosures. A bank lawyer hand delivers a courtesy copy of a motion to dismiss a Declaratory Judgment counterclaim to a specific judge who is not assigned to the case yet. The homeowner has never got any traction in the case since the day he got foreclosure mil attorney Thomas P. Dore to admit Under Oath that he had no personal firsthand knowledge of anything required to foreclose.

Naturally that judge is Mickey Norman, one of the area judges who has not yet sanctioned foreclosure mill attorney Thomas P. Dore for false documents and notaries, which is specifically why Maryland enacted Emergency Rule 14-207.1 with Judge Alan Wilner -- MD Judge of the Year -- Chairing the Committee. He said this was the specific reason, document fraud. And Dore has had 18 notaries decommissioned because of notary fraud and he and his foreclosure friends have been reprimanded and cases dismissed.

Naturally that judge is the magically assigned to the case. Naturally that judge then has a complete bias against the homeowner, and he berates him, yells at him and lies about the true purpose of Rule 14-207.1 bellowing "I know the rule and the reason for it, and it doesn't have anything to do with [fraudulent documents]." 

He was acting in the manner of a rogue judge at that point, and yet there is more, much much more as the Court had already determined before the hearing that he was going to find the homeowner to be a vexatious litigant so he could truncate his First Amendment Rights to pleading, and even though he had to file so many things because the Court refused to take any action on his pleadings for months on end.

The homeowner had made a filing in error at one point because the underlying case was on appeal so there was no jurisdiction, right. There was therefore a dismissal because of subject matter jurisdiction against the homeowner but the Court but the judge continually basing his ruling of vexatious litigant on a different order from the same judge on the same day that held the dismissal was done with prejudice, even though there was not one scintilla of evidence that the court intended the with prejudice order to be governing --- and the homeowner swore he did not remember seeing the "with prejudice" order until recently submitted by the same defense counsel who hand picked Mickey Norman. And besides, how could it be issued with prejudice if the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, ab initio?

It is a tangled web some of those judges are weaving down there in Maryland to protect M&T Bank because M&T Bank runs Maryland. But no judge should ever lie like that in Open Court about the intent of remedial legislation, and now that I have seen and heard it with my own eyes and ears I know that Judge Mickey Norman and the lawyers involved has stained the integrity of the judiciary, just as Thomas P. Dore has now twice been reprimanded for doing the same.

And naturally no one could find my notices of media coverage, even though they were all sent via tracked U.S. Mail. See EI 713089986US. To add insult to injury, the Court threatened criminal contempt if any of this proceeding was taped, a message clearly meant for Yours Truly. This was but only the second time in three (3) years a foreclosure court has forbidden my video coverage of a case. The other time was with a shady referee in California, and we know how dirty California is.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Watch Hand-Picked Judge Mickey Norman Protect M&T Bank and Twice-Disciplined Foreclosure Mill Attorney Thomas P. Dore in Fraudclosure Case.


Get your update here to learn more about how junior judge Mickey Norman disrespected Judge of the Year Alan Wilner.

Maryland has the highest per capita rate of foreclosures. A bank lawyer hand delivers a courtesy copy of a motion to dismiss a Declaratory Judgment counterclaim to a specific judge who is not assigned to the case yet. The homeowner has never got any traction in the case since the day he got foreclosure mil attorney Thomas P. Dore to admit Under Oath that he had no personal firsthand knowledge of anything required to foreclose.

Naturally that judge is Mickey Norman, one of the area judges who has not yet sanctioned foreclosure mill attorney Thomas P. Dore for false documents and notaries, which is specifically why Maryland enacted Emergency Rule 14-207.1 with Judge Alan Wilner -- MD Judge of the Year -- Chairing the Committee. He said this was the specific reason, document fraud. And Dore has had 18 notaries decommissioned because of notary fraud and he and his foreclosure friends have been reprimanded and cases dismissed........

**********************

Y'all be sure and catch this on my Mortgage Movies Journal page... video coming....
Manufacturers And Traders Trust Company (192.216.61.102) [Label IP Address]    1 returning visit
Update 2 May 2013: I see my friends at M&T Bank are back.... what's the matter guys, never seen a reporter with my knowledge base and skill set before, have you? Better get used to it.

Here they come again, always up in my shit but when I send them not one but two Notices of Media Coverage they lose them both. Query, who is J.F. who signed for the latest one on 26 April?

But their law clerk/court clerk certainly knew how to find me during the hearing..... look at the times carefully. At one point I caught her staring and me and I just looked back and smiled, I know the game.
Baltimore County Government (167.102.138.245) [Label IP Address]  

Movie coming soon! 
There is Attorney John Y. Lee and boy oh boy is his law firm Gordon-Feinblatt loving my journals! For proof of my assertion scroll to the bottom to see the dozens of entries they are reviewing today.

I don’t know what is in his trick bag today but yesterday, and several weeks ago he somehow managed to fit a Baltimore Circuit Court Judge in that bag:  Today I attended what basically resembled a kangaroo court hearing that was orchestrated at the outset by Attorney John Y. Lee, when he hand delivered memoranda to Judge Norman….. before Norman was even assigned to the case.

Naturally Judge Norman became the Judge on the case. One must wonder why Lee picked Norman instead of, say, Judge King who found foreclosure mill attorney Thomas P. Dore to have violated several ethics rules. It was the second such determination that Dore has faced in connection with foreclosure cases in the past 3 years, for use of false documents and signatures.

  
As such, according to Judge Wilner and the Committee drafting Rule 14-207.1  Thomas P. Dore has now TWICE been involved in conduct that is “prejudicial to homeowners and constitutes an assault on the integrity of the judicial process itself,” yet the Wetzelbergers are repeatedly denied any meaningful opportunity to address the wrongs in their case that implicate issues of Standing and Real Party in Interest:

The fun started this morning when a young, impressionable female law clerk or bailiff told me I could set up my rig in the corner after I explained that I had filed not one but at least two Notices of Media Coverage. Both of these Notices thoroughly documented the fact that the Court and other government entities track my Mortgage Movies Journal every time I document activity against Thomas P. Dore. As you may recall, Dore had 18 notaries relinquish their commissions and many cases were discharged....[snip]

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: Ongoing Notice of Media Coverage of Foreclosure Mill Attorney Thomas P. Dore Escaping from Emergency Rule 14-207.1 Scrutiny.


There is a hearing coming up as early as 30 April, 2013 in a crazy case in which Thomas P. Dore was dismissed even though the Case was on appeal and there was no jurisdiction. Dore has, on prior occasion, admitted Under Oath that he had no firsthand knowledge of anything material necessary to foreclose in the case. Moreover, as you will see, there is empirical evidence that Maryland Courts are not giving homeowners the respect and protection to which they are entitled per Emergency Rule 14-207.1. The rule requires that full and fair hearings are supposed to be conducted when there are issues raised regarding Holder in Due Course, Real Party in Interest and Standing to Foreclosure. However, in reality, whenever Thomas P. Dore is involved, the rules are suspended, even though he is the one that should be suspended from practice because he was TWICE reprimanded for issuing false, fraudulent and/or forged signatures in foreclosure cases. As such, Circuit Judge King's December, 2012 ruling admonishing Thomas P. Dore (Mortgage Movies short film) was incomplete. Watch for new short films and courtoom video in the coming weeks, I know from prior experience (watch the movie below) that the Maryland Courts will be following every step of the way, and Daily Record writer Steve Lash had best take note.  Here's a Daily Record story on Rule 14-207.1. Writes Lash:
The new rule, which takes effect immediately, allows circuit courts to appoint independent lawyers to review foreclosure documents for problems. If a problem with the lender’s paperwork is detected, it has 30 days to show — at its own expense — why the foreclosure should not be dismissed. Judges may also summon lawyers and notaries public into court when the authenticity of a signature or the veracity of an attestation to the accuracy of a document’s contents is in question. 
While the changes may seem far-reaching, retired Judge Alan M. Wilner, head of the committee that drafted the new rule and presented it to the Court of Appeals, said the rule simply consolidates existing powers. Judges have “the inherent authority” to require attorneys to answer questions regarding their affidavits and to “show cause” why a case, including a foreclosure action, should not be dismissed, he told the court. 
I will be discussing this case again on OneRadioNetwork where I a guest speaker yesterday, and Judge Wilner -- MD Bar Judge of the Year and author of the report I excerpted above in the second thumbnail-- will no doubt be interested!


Thursday, April 18, 2013

Deadly Clear, KingCast and Mortgage Movies Celebrate as Northwest Trustee Services is Sanctioned and Twice Loses FDCPA Summary Judgment Arguments.

So much for "Proudly servicing the needs of mortgage lenders in the West."

Deadly Clear reports on Beaton v. J.P. Morgan and NWTS here

“To the extent that Chase acquired Beaton’s loan in 2008 before she defaulted, it falls within the section 1692a(6)(F) exemption of “debt collector.” NWTS was appointed as successor trustee on November 29, 2010. However, Beaton had been in default since approximately July 1, 2010. Accordingly, NWTS does not fall within the same exemption. Beaton alleges that the identity of the “Note Bearer/Creditor remains unknown[,]” that it remains undetermined if Chase is the actual beneficiary pursuant to RCW 61.24.005(2), and that NWTS violated FDCPA and damaged the Plaintiff by foreclosing her property.

Liberally construed, the court finds that Beaton has plausibly alleged that NWTS attempted to collect on a debt that may not have been owed to Chase, which may have violated the FDCPA. See McDonald II, 2013 WL 858178 at *12 (“At the time [NWTS began the foreclosure process], NWTS had not been appointed successor trustee and was not acting on behalf of the entity that had actual physical possession of the note: it therefore lacked the right to effect dispossession of plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff has established that NWTS violated § 1692f(6)(A) of the FDCPA.”); Michelson v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, Case No. C11-1445MJP, 2012 WL 3240241, *5 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 7, 2012) (“NWTS and RCO may have violated the FDCPA because they did not yet have confirmation of Chase’s right to possess the property, and thus may have violated § 1692f(6)(A)”).

I added McDonald v. Onewest Bank et al. 2013 Lexis 31730 (W.D. Washington March 7, 2013), which I will upload to SCRIBD:

CONCLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 172) and plaintiff's cross motion (Dkt. # 176) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants are hereby enjoined from proceeding with any foreclosure procedure based on the January 12, 2010, notice of [*48] default.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

New Constituent Letters and Repeated FOIA Requests Pin Senator Robert Menendez as Phony for Protecting BoA and Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg.



With all the hubub over the Good Dr. Salomon Melgen I figured we could take time to study the Good Senator on other matters.

As noted in the video, Senator Menendez talks a mean talk but he has not proved to many of us that he walks the mean walk. Observe the dichotomy between his get tough stance on the Senate Floor and his benevolent despotism when called to answer to media or homeowners who have been victimized by the very banks and lawyers he portends to go after. And when I say victimized, I mean having Phelan, Hallinan & Schmieg call the police on an innocent homeowner, at which point the Good Senator's junior assistant tell us that the Senator will welcome our report. Read the back story here and here.
We gave him a report, and his senior aide Betsy Gilligan basically told us to go to hell, despite receiving correspondence from a NJ homeowners' group in our favor. Given what my camera looked like at the end of that hallway we damn well could have been shot, and apparently that would have been preferable to the cops befriending us and making it out alive as the lead officer called Phelan, Hallinan & Schmieg and said "We have two gentlemen out here and we don't know what the fuck is going on because no one is answering the door."
Watch the movie and wait for the links to the new (reiterated) FOIA request and the letter from two U.S. War Veterans who wrote Senator Menendez to no avail. He did, however send them a request for campaign contributions, ahem. 

Thursday, April 4, 2013

KingCast and Mortgage Movies welcome M&T bank to the websites.

You guys have a little chat with the DLLR (again) and Thomas P. Dore (again)?
I am quite certain you did.