Housing is a Civil Right

Housing is a Civil Right

Monday, August 31, 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Jack Markell & Joe Biden DE Legacy Marked by Racism, Police Abuse, Stolen Election & First Amendment Contempt.


I wrote the global email:

And by the way Detective Hill, while they are thinking about prosecuting me, how about prosecuting Bill Christy for threatening to whip my black ass online (read below) and calling me a motherfucker on my phone? 


Or is that just the Delaware Way. 


Been waiting 6 years for this day, and y'all played right into it. 

Ciao.
Last week's comprehensive journal entry on the NAACP/Denn/Markell/Delaware Journal coverup story where Central NAACP President La Mar was not even invited to the meeting. The thumbnail video pictures below may be viewed as YouTube videos at this link.

Look: I don't give a damn that Governor Markell and Judge Robert B. Young or the Defendants in my Free Press First Amendment lawsuit hate every second of my videos.  Further, I don't give a damn that Joe Biden is running for President. I'm going to say what I have to say, and that includes him telling me that he and Barack would address multiple 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) violations by white men like Greg Floyd, then failing to bust a grape..... bottom line is that he needs to take care of business in his own back yard before trying to run a Country.

Let's face it folks Governor Markell's legacy is now forever tainted and potential presidential candidate Joe Biden should be ashamed. While Baltimore takes all the national attention what we continue to see in this country time and time again is that black lives really don't matter in Delaware either. I've covered stories where some white lives didn't matter as well, but the problem is particularly pronounced against blacks and all of this goes back decades to the Baldus study for you legal scholars.

What type of people defend the police on public fora?  Interestingly 7 years after our first meeting, I see a potty-mouthed Bill Christy, a/k/a Lower Slower Delaware, who falsely befriended me when I was investigating police abuse against whites in Franconia, NH.   Liko Kenney shot a notoriously abusive cop before a multiple felon Greg Floyd picked up the cops gun and executed Mr. Kenney. More on Floyd and Joe Biden later, but Christy identified himself as a Judge Advocate General Attorney in the armed forces, then turned on me and said that I had no arguments and that there was no coverup. Come to find out he never was an attorney of any kind, so the more I exposed he called me a nigger and a motherfucker on my voicemail and tried to get it removed from YouTube. He failed but that's how it is in Delaware, racist. And Christy is a liar watch the movie. Here he is calling me a motherfucker.

He publicly wrote: I am 5'11" and weight 185 pounds and I could kick you(sic) ignorant little black ghetto ass any day of the week and not even break a sweat.

And he did it in a forum designed to address the concerns of a dead child:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/franconia-nh/TN85VE6SATBDSV8QK/p21

**********
So today first we will watch the lies in action over in Bloomfield NJ where the police are facing a lawsuit for covering up video and lying after unlawful threatened use of deadly force and evidence tampering then move on to Delaware.
In this case yesterday I demanded all of the 911 audio and video camera information from the State. Many people claim that Terrence Fletcher did not have a gun in his immediate possession when shot. Lets get one thing straight:  As a former LE attorney and journalist I can tell you that police lie, especially when it comes to a potentially wrongful use of force. That is why it is Constitutional to run video of any public official during the prosecution of their duties, subject to reasonable time place and manner restrictions. This is true in the lobby of the Kent County Delaware Recorder of Deeds too, where I came to investigate the stolen election against LaMar Gunn but Judge Robert B. Young won't admit it, but more on that later.
 

Now then in Delaware recall the kick in face to a handcuffed black suspect. Recall the five (5) male deaths that AG Matt Denn determined to be suicides, as if black males are apt to go to public parks and hang themselves with belts. Recall the 911 tape that I just obtained regarding Henry Fordham, who narrowly escaped an attempted lynching. Dover police refused to provide this tape for years, but you can hear all of it, and learn a lot more about how Delaware really works as a tool of oppression, driven by big money and banking interests, on the journal pages linked in this YouTube video.

Of particular note and fully documented on my pages is how Joe Biden promised me that his administration would crack down on multiple gun felon Greg Floyd, a white man, but they did nothing and he went on to criminally threaten his neighbor with a gun, I've got the courtroom video of his conviction and violent outbursts on my pages.

Friday, August 28, 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: August 28 2015 Update in Busby v. Reimer & BoA. A Rule 60 Memorandum Using Ron Chernek Deposition in Which he Admits he Doesn't Know Jack Shit!


August 28 2015 Update: Busby v. Reimer & BoA Rule 60 Memorandum using Ron Chernek Deposition in which he admits he doesn't know jack shit!



Ronald John Chernek, Esq. a resident of Ohio is a lawyer licensed to practice law and a shareholder of Reimer. He was the head of the foreclosure Department. F. Peter Costello, Esq. of Reimer prepared the bogus Assignment of Mortgage in the Busby’s foreclosure case. Reimer engaged in a pattern and practice of creating, submitting to courts, and recording documents with false and/or misleading representations in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(2) &(10) and 1692f.
From Glazer v. Chase:
Both foreclosure complaints filed against Plaintiff state that CHF is “the holder” of the Klie note. (Exhs B&D.) Under the version of R.C. 1301.01 in effect at the time relevant to this matter, “holder” means either of the following: “(a) if the instrument is payable to bearer, a person who is in possession of the instrument; or “(b) if the instrument is payable to an identified person, the identified person when in possession of the instrument.”
Mr. Chernek testified regarding RACJ’s process for verifying that the foreclosure plaintiff was in fact the holder of the note:

Q.   So what steps were required in your firm in 2008 to confirm that the Plaintiff can actually have the authority to enforce a lost note?
A   We -- first of all, we executed the assignment that we reviewed before and that was recorded --
Q    Okay.
A --and that was the governing document. We wouldn't file a case unless we had an Assignment. [...]
Q.    Let's go to the assignment that you signed in the Klie matter.
A    Okay.
Q    And you see there you are transferring a note from J.P. Morgan to Chase? 
A   Okay.
Q    So, sir, when you prepared this assignment, how did you determine that J.P. Morgan actually held a note signed by Mr. Klie?
MS. BROWN: Objection.
A    We -- we didn't have a copy of the note, so we-- I don't know how we would have done it at this time. I don't really know. I don't remember this one.
Q    And how would you have gone to confirm that J.P. Morgan has the authority to enforce a note that they may or may not hold?
A    We can only look at the mortgage, the title work, and the assignment alleges both, as it is here, but I have nothing in my possession -- we have nothing in our possession.
Q    So if there's a mortgage, you assume that the person who is the mortgagee have the note? A Well, they -- we assert that they're the holder of the note, yes.
Q.    But do you verify that factual assertion in any way?
A    Other than what the client represents to us, no, because we're not at Chase. (ECF Doc. #179 Chernek 130:7-132:16)

Defendants knew that FNMA was the owner and holder of the Klie note: the FADIS referral letter said so. (see also Decl Exh. P, p1, L) FNMA’s Servicing Guide is equally clear on the fact that FNMA owned and held the note.

Thursday, August 27, 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies in Dismay at Coverup NAACP/Racism Puff Piece in Delaware News Journal That Ignores Lynchings, the Stolen La Mar Gunn Election and Judge Robert B. Young's Misconduct in King v. McKenna First Amendment Lawsuit.



BTW La Mar Gunn tells me he wasn't even invited to that little Dog'n'Pony show... and he is NAACP Central President as noted in another Delawareonline feature,  "NAACP: War Being Waged on Dover's Black Community."  These people are pure scum.
 All right guys, 

That story is weak:

When we spoke an hour ago:

I told her all about how Judge Young made up facts and ignored law to dismiss my First Amendment case; told her how he put me in "interior offices and employee cubicles" when I was nowhere near any such things, and how he ignored all of my professional credentials to instead pejoratively call me (as a black man) a "guerrilla journalist." Yeah, well guerrilla THIS Your Honor:

Yeah well he's a Real-Life Archie Bunker, how about that.  Real Men like Randy NewmanNed Beatty, or Carroll O'Connor (RIP) see him for what he really is: A hegemonic, bigoted, bought-and sold racist Judge who doesn't know his First Amendment ass from a hole in the ground.

I told her all about how the State stole the Election from LaMar Gunn.

I told her a bit about Dr. Jahi Issa and the lynchings that Attorney Denn ignored and claimed were "suicides."

I told her everything she needs to know she can see in the Rednecks video and the video about Detective Hill calling me while AG Denn stalled in addressing my Civil Rights complaint that they bailed on for all the wrong reasons because Denn is Markell's boot licking water boy as noted in the videos.  Markell is an architect of racism himself, ask Chip Flowers and La Mar Gunn.

And I told her about my background as an NAACP Legal Chair and daily news reporter before law school and several successful First Amendment trials and settlements while I told her that I know full well that her bought-and-sold editors will never allow any coverage of my case or anything real about those lynchings "In Delaware, they Lynch Negroes (Donald Ayotte, Red state).

In the end even if I don't appeal (to face another corrupt Delaware Court before trying to get Cert. at SCOTUS) at least I have inflicted some collateral damage and obtained the 911 call regarding the first degree assault/attempted murder against Henry Fordham and many of us will be forwarding the information to the Republicans. 

She said send me some information, well that's bullshit; she's been on this email chain for at least a week now.

Your State is a joke. More accurately a crying shame, and as noted by Randy Newman and me, you are the real "Rednecks" of the so-called progressive North, when every other State allows Free Press Cameras, be it Constitutional, statutory or common law -- even the southern states.  

But Good Ol' Boy Judge Young ignored all of that and just threw my case out and basically said "go to hell nigger, take me up on appeal," just as I told Reporter Masulli.

The shame is Delaware's not mine. Below is my Motion to Recuse Judge Robert B. Young for manifest bias in my case but just before that, take a little while to watch the video about Potential Democratic Candidate Joe Biden lying to me about protecting America from multiple felon Greg Floyd. Floyd, seen at left, is basically a caged animal who violated 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) repeatedly, and VP Biden walked up to me in Nashua when I brought it up and he put his arm around me and asked "you're a lawyer aren't you," and I said "yessir, and I just want to make sure you guys do the right thing."  

Well he did not, and despite numerous letters to the U.S. Attorneys office they never addressed this matter and Floyd of course went on to be convicted for threatening his elderly female neighbor with a gun. In the video below watch the explosive courtroom outburst from this man who enjoyed full protection from Federal prosecution under Joe Biden's watch. Just the facts, folks. I'll make sure the Republicans have all of this. Chalk it up to collateral damage, again. $12,500 or anything close to that could have settled my case..... none of this would have come up. Keep saying that number in your head guys.


Monday, August 24, 2015

Nasty 911 Call as KingCast, Mortgage Movies and Randy Newman Present: "Rednecks -- In Honor of Delaware AG Matt Denn and Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse Judge Robert B. Young in a Dicey Free Press First Amendment Case."


The 911 call may be heard in its entirety, above. Below are some key passages:

"I'm down at the end by Silver Lake Park... It sounded like someone was hollering stop stop stop at the park... maybe I hear people, I've turn all my lights on... they were speaking maybe harshly to each other.... It sounded like someone was yelling for help.... There's a car leaving, a white truck leaving...He's laying in my yard he's hollering and laying down he's saying help help... 101 Washington.... Oh my goodness. I don't see any visible injury.... He's said call 911. Apparently he was robbed and they tried to kill him. The white truck left the park. It was a pickup truck. A white truck fairly new. I guess he climbed over the fence I don't know what he's doing... He's all beat up. He needs an ambulance." 

 (Next call from car to dispatch) "This is Davis in Dover can you start an ambulance to 101 Washington Street it's gonna be a reference to an assault victim who apparently was robbed... we have an officer on the scene now....."
I received the 18 August 2015 Letter from AG Denn and reply as follows: 

This is an evasive response and pretty much what I expected. First of all it was not recent, and second, this is a discriminatory viewpoint-based policy (even though the Court has not made them disclose their policy or authority to shutter cameras), and Denn and Reardon completely ignored any reference to the AG Memorandum that specifically warned public bodies the banning cameras is done at substantial risk. 

Stay tuned for a Randy Newman/KingCast short film, “Rednecks.” 

Furthermore, AG Denn and his office ignored all of the other case law I sent them from every other jurisdiction in similar circumstances where Courts ruled access is protected. So unlike Georgia AG Sam Olens who actually got off his ass and sued for a violation for Ms. Tisdale, Denn has feet of clay as I noted on YouTube because he is Gov. Markell’s water boy and Markell was pivotal in stealing Mr. Gunn’s election, simple.

What is interesting, however, is what was not said in the Denn letter: By completely failing to address the 2011 Memo he did not say that Defendants' interpretation of that letter was correct as a matter of public policy. They want to say that public policy and the First Amendment lean against me because the Recorder of Deeds is not a "public body" but then again neither was the police station where the Pomykacz Plaintiff did her photography, yet and still it was protected conduct under the First Amendment. If you were to limit where cameras could run based on whether the venue was a "public body" then you couldn't record government officials in any public venue, think about it.  The Defendants are acting like a bunch of rednecks, and I am offended by that because there's more than a little redneck in me and they are staining the Brand, ahem.

Sunday, August 23, 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Say Quincy Incumbents May Face Lawsuit After Bogus FEMA Build Permit Denials.



Worry much guys?
In an email sent just now, 28 August I wrote:  I see somebody is reading. A lot. And that weapons raid is suspect too. You guys working with Boston PD and Fire on that? Those are bad people doing bad things too. You don't want to associate with them. Since nobody wants to talk I'll just stop in with my cameras next time I am out East. I'm sure there's a logical explanation. Ciao.
You want some more, how about 16 LCR 305; 2008 Mass. LCR LEXIS 71 (2008) -- Quincy ZBA granted Special Use Permit to a family that appears to be in a similar zone and flood plain (see flood map and zoning map). Attorney Richard "Chip" Nylen spanked the neighbors' collective behinds after the ZBA granted the SUP in favor of Roy and Maureen Berggen.

If Mr. Berlo is given the chance to comply with other VALID requirements he will do so. But you have to give him that chance but you have not.... I've told Maureen Berggen all about this.

Why can't James Berlo pull a Build Permit?
He owns his property outright so he does not need FEMA/Flood insurance
But Maragaret Laforest told him he does.....
While telling the rest of Quincy something else.


Quincy Mayor Tom Koch is going to hate me just a little bit for stirring up yet more dirt in his town, but I have more than a working knowledge of zoning laws and corruption in Boston, Revere and Quincy MA. I've been a zoning manager who obtained zoning for wireless carriers in several areas of the country including the Greater Boston Area. In zoning we are always aware of SHPO, THPO and NEPA and FEMA issues. I've pulled countless building permits over the years. 

Now In Boston I also documented false evidence like this magic bullet that allegedly landed there in the Dan Talbot police shooting and I obtained counsel for Joanna Marinova to obtain a $.6M Jury verdict and $900K settlement against the Boston Herald for Defamation. That all started after she was on my radio show five years ago. 

And in Revere I exposed the fact that they put up a new housing complex on contaminated land that was not properly vetted so that the taxpayers never knew about the contamination before it was approved. 
So we now come to Quincy, where I definitely see the potential for a lawsuit with substantial damages being awarded to homeowner James Berlo. I started by reporting on the first Quincy Road rage case that was on my radio show five years ago too, where the general press ignored the fact that there was cocaine in the car with Firefighter Joseph Fasano....which was not charged because it was "recreational cocaine." 

Today in Quincy, Ward one City Councilor Margaret Laforest and her apparently best friend Inspection Services Director Jay Duca both told James Berlo on Quincy letterhead that he needs to obtain flood insurance before he can build on his historic home that he purchased in July 2012. Therefore this remains the critical component that has kept him from obtaining a Build Permit, and he has successfully built out a gutted home located at 2 Monument court in the City of Boston.

The problem is, her April 2014 letter to the general public (at top) says otherwise. It clearly states that you don't need any such insurance as long as you don't have a mortgage. Well, Mr. Berlo owns his home free and clear so what's the hangup? Here's the relevant case law I pulled from LEXIS and it clearly shows that no insurance is needed in this case. I believe the hangup is that he owns a very unique property that they would love to force him out of so they could help their cronies obtain it.  I have it on information and belief that at least one of his neighbors went through this and successfully sued. 

Meanwhile Mr. Berlo continues to get bogus threats on National Grid letter head when National Grid told him they would never issue such a letter. He claims there is no lawful reason for him to move his meter outside and this is just yet another hassle. Who's behind that? Mr. Berldo informs that it was Gary Stone the Supervisor at the Gas Co. that told him “You will be in Violation of the Department of Public Utilities” He telephoned the DPU and they said that’s absolutely not true and they don’t have that kind of Power. 

Then again I have heard that Paul E. McCarthy the Town of Canton's only Inspector has been on the City of Quincy Payroll for over a dozen years making $90,000 a year working two hours a week as a City of Quincy Inspector Time will tell on all of this but something also tells me that once this issue hits the public airwaves and Mr. Berlo obtains counsel, this conduct will cease immediately. The only remaining question will be how to quantify his damages for living with 3 years of this abuse. 

If any of them have a problem with this or think they want to have a go at me for Defamation just shoot me an email and I'll waive service so we can get right to it. But they won't do that because I'll get discovery on them and that will be even worse than the videos that I'm queuing up. 

So that's it for now, but I'll be back. The other question of course, is whether Councilor Laforest will be back in the fall because if she is, I'll be paying her a visit with KingCast Mortgage Movies cameras. And perhaps some of these faces will be greeting Quincy taxpayers instead of the less than ideal personnel to whom we are accustomed.

 Ciao.


Monday, August 17, 2015

KingCast & Mortgage Movies File a Motion to Recuse Delaware Judge Robert B. Young for Manifest Bias in Free Press First Amendment Case.


Above is the first movie about Kent County Delaware Judge Robert B. Young. More to follow. Below is a Motion to Recuse and a Reinstatement of Trial fee: Get this.... Update 17 Aug 2015: Allegedly because my Trial Fee was 12 days late now the Court will refuse to accept any further documents what a joke, right. The flipping Trial is scheduled for fall 2016 for crissakes and I will note as much for the record, which the Court will return as well, and I will keep all of the filings for Appeal. 

Note that they didn't deem my filings late until 13 August when documents had been received and accepted back on 5 August, so Judge Young clearly saw the heat coming and went Draconian, repeating the mantra "whitewash the file, whitewash the file....." 

Whatever they do, the law is out there and everyone can see that Judge Young lied about Iacobucci and inserted items not in the Record to suit his whimsy, i.e. "inner offices" and "private cubicles" and "guerrilla journalist." As I said, it must be an easy life being an establishment attorney in Delaware you can say and do as you please and have people like Judge Young run and get your back 24/7. The joke is really on the taxpayers of Delaware, and the shame is on them, that's the thing of it. 

Not that they care because the mantra is "enforce the Delaware Way at all costs," and one negro from Washington State will never change that. I will, however expose their corruption to a few thousand people and cause a little collateral damage along the way and who knows, possibly win an appeal. In the meantime they have have their happy little fiefdom because I have no cause to ever be there again. It's a hell hole owned and run by corporate interests. The Reinstatement of Trial Fee document is here.




Tuesday, August 11, 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Finish King v. McKenna, Malone, Paradee Memo in Opposition to Judgment on the Pleadings in Free Press Case: Slams Defendants and Judge Robert B. Young but Good.

I really let them have it good.  Of course they've an Establishment Judge totally in their pocket but you know I just don't care anymore, I found the law that I found it says what it says, and what it says is that people in the Third Circuit have a right to video public officials and police officers wherever they may be working subject to reasonable restrictions. And the best part is, they cited the Iacobucci case that Judge Young said was NOT decided on First Amendment grounds. Ha!

I also slipped in Fn4: As a relatively militant black man I feel good though even though the Court clearly has it in for me: Unlike La Mar Gunn I haven’t had an election stolen from me, I haven’t been lynched and I never have to set foot in Delaware again, nor will I. The remainder of this case will be heard on paper. Now that’s saying a lot for Delaware, even though AG Denn swears up and down that those five (5) black men all committed suicide, some by hanging by a belt. I have notified Douglas Beatty, Ohio Federal Prosecutor Steven J. Dettlebach and several other groups of people about my concerns in that regard after Detective Jeff Hill telephoned me because some unidentified folks were apparently concerned about my emails. See generally “First Amendment Lawsuits Show Markell, AG Biden, AG Denn Coverup of Black Lynchings” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QibeMFiaxgM
Excerpts from the filing:

First of all, Defendants now claim "....public body law and access to public meetings is inapplicable." (Defendants’ Joint Motion para 14-18, 21 et seq.) Well that is precisely what Plaintiff said, ab initio, while the Court was busy giving him the bum’s rush earlier: 

It is the Pomykacz, Cirelli, Iacobucci and Glik cases and their progeny, including Third Circuit’s Montgomery v. Killingsworth, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7152 (January 22, 2015)(ACLU link) that are most germane because they all involve journalists filming public officials in and out of their offices. There’s the a-ha moment of this entire case. 

The point is, Defendants and the Court cannot have it both ways: If public body/public meeting analyses are inapplicable now in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, then they were inapplicable in the first place when the Court struck Plaintiff's Constitutional claims and there’s yet another compelling reason for the Supreme Court of the United States to give this case a prompt Remand in the name of Justice. Gotcha. 

 ************ 

Next, it is perfectly legal to photograph, video and to criticize police officers wherever they may be, and Judge Young can't cover it up any longer (but he will most assuredly try): 

Next, the Court’s Patent Misrepresentation (read: lie) -- about Iacobucci v. Boulter, 1997 U.S. Dist. Lexis 7010, No. CIV.A. 94-10531 (D.Mass, Mar. 26, 1997) is startling: 

Iacobucci specifically found that an independent reporter has a protected right under the First Amendment and state law to videotape public meetings and the events that occurred in the hallways of a public building. And quite frankly, for the coup de gras, the Third Circuit understands it as well so Judge Young should recognize that it cited Iacobucci and Glik just this year – prior to Plaintiff filing suit. 

The fact of the matter is, if a citizen in the Third Circuit is entitled to politely criticize a police officer during the prosecution of his or her duties, then Plaintiff had dang well better be permitted to ask a couple of polite questions at the County Recorder’s Office. See Montgomery v. Killingsworth, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7152 (January 22, 2015). 

Judge Young’s rationale is thoroughly rejected and slammed down to the ground with the force of an illegal police choke hold when Iacobucci is specifically cited in Montgomery v. Killingsworth, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7152 (January 22, 2015).                   
In Iacobucci v. Boulter, the First Circuit concluded that the plaintiff, Iacobucci, had a First Amendment right to film local government officials who were conducting public business in a public building. .
...accord Gaymon v. Borough of Collingdale, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93014 (July 17, 2015) as we shall soon see.  
In contrast, qualified immunity was rejected for the remaining First Amendment claim because "peaceful criticism of a police officer that neither obstructs an investigation nor jeopardizes a police officer's safety has strong social value, serving as a valuable check on state power, and is therefore protected under the First Amendment." Killingsworth, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7152, 2015 WL 289934, at *8 (citing Gentile v. State Bar of Nev., 501 U.S. 1030, 1034, 111 S. Ct. 2720, 115 L. Ed. 2d 888 (1991) ("There is no question that speech critical of the exercise of the State's power lies at the very center of the First Amendment.").7
PS: Note: There are no private cubicles in Plaintiff’s immediate camera view. Somehow Plaintiff finds this significant but then what does he know: According to Judge Young he’s just a “Guerrilla Journalist,” even though such phrase appeared nowhere in his Complaints. That is because His Honor’s cultural hegemony is showing. Plaintiff will take this opportunity to remind him that the Courtroom is no place for that.

Here is a Motion to Recuse and a Reinstatement of Trial fee: Get this.... Update 17 Aug 2015: Allegedly because my Trial Fee was 12 days late now the Court will refuse to accept any further documents what a joke, right. I will note as much for the record, which the Court will return as well, and I will keep all of the filings for Appeal. 

 Note that they didn't deem my filings late until 13 August when documents had been received and accepted back on 5 August, so Judge Young clearly saw the heat coming and went Draconian, repeating the mantra "whitewash the file, whitewash the file....." 

Whatever they do, the law is out there and everyone can see that Judge Young lied about Iacobucci and inserted items not in the Record to suit his whimsy, i.e. "inner offices" and "private cubicles" and "guerrilla journalist." As I said, it must be an easy life being an establishment attorney in Delaware you can say and do as you please and have people like Judge Young run and get your back 24/7. The joke is really on the taxpayers of Delaware, and the shame is on them, that's the thing of it. 

Not that they care because the mantra is "enforce the Delaware Way at all costs," and one negro from Washington State will never change that. I will, however expose their corruption to a few thousand people and cause a little collateral damage along the way and who knows, possibly win an appeal. In the meantime they have have their happy little fiefdom because I have no cause to ever be there again. It's a hell hole owned and run by corporate interests. The Reinstatement of Trial document is here.

Here is the first video about Judge Young and his actions in this case. More to follow.