At left, thanks to my pals at 4Closurefraud journal coverage of Deutschebank v. Anthony Tarantola and Trustee Diane Kerns, you see how clear it is that these banks and servicers almost never have True Standing to foreclose. Okay so I am finally sending out the Ethics Complaint against various NH lawyers and Judge Diane Nicolosi for allowing what appears to be Fraud Upon the Court. If other jurisdictions can see the Fraud and lack of standing inherent to this securitized note fiasco why can't they? Or is it that they see it but just don't care, either way they should be removed from their positions and someone more responsible substituted.
New Jersey favors cameras but there are some limitations that threaten the independent journalist. I meet those criteria and am forwarding my media notice tomorrow. What is most telling however, is that the lawyers for the NJ Bar Association voted against access, which is completely antithetical to everything that law is supposed to stand for. Open government, principled decisions made out in the open, all of it. That's because too many lawyers are involved in shady, corrupt, ethically-challenged, amoral and immoral conduct, and that's a fact. I hate scumbag attorneys.
As I told my Montana friends who are working with me to establish a legal database for wins, I'm good to go. Besides, life is more fun from this side of the camera, anyway :)
Tarantola in text:
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
COMPANY, as Trustee in trust for the
Certificateholders for Argent Securities MEMORANDUM DECISION
Certificates, Series 2004-W8, its assignees
DIANNE C. KERNS, Chapter 13 Trustee,
Yet again, the court is called upon to decide whether the purported holder of a note allegedly transferred into a securitized mortgage pool has standing to obtain relief from the automatic stay. Yet again, the movant has failed to demonstrate that it has standing. To make matters worse, the movant filed its motion without evidentiary support of its claim, attempted to create such evidentiary support after the fact, and only disclosed its “real” evidence on the day of the final evidentiary hearing. The relief will be denied.