Good Day Attorney Paradee, I see you are trying to railroad the State High Court into holding an expedited hearing so that you can get Betty Lou McKenna sworn in by Governor Markell. We vigorously oppose that little end-around the Fair Election Process.
I am aware that you find me funny, but while you're busy laughing I along with others are filing DOJ complaints, the GOP Chair, the Black Caucus, the NAACP and I have all addressed Governor Markell.
Further, I spoke with Senator Coons' office in light of his Voting Rights Act advocacy and Candidate Gunn is demanding a full forensic evaluation of those mystery ballots. My Free Press First Amendment lawsuit will arrive in your hands with Waiver of Summons by the end of this week or top of next. If you and your candidate and the State actors like Lisa Robinson have nothing to hide then you all should freely welcome this sort of inquiry and have an open process where hard drive and ink forensics are employed. I will settle for nothing less, so suit yourself, I guess
La Mar Gunn won 6 times to my count. They just could NOT let him win.
Also State of Delaware caught a case of the worries; they have been all
camped out in my journal page. I should start charging rent, LOL.
Sign the Petition:
After all, as noted in today's forthcoming Petition and YouTube video, the Governor has to know that this is his legacy as well as the legacy of the State. They passed the buck to him and the buck has to stop with him, it's as simple as that. He can be engaged in petty politics or he can take the high road. These people don't like the high road; we see what happened to me when I took it, they shut down my cameras and lied to me about the public policy as noted by the County Corporate Attorney. I have always traditionally worked for Democrats. Jesse Jackson. Dick Gephardt. John Kerry. But this issue is bigger than any political affiliation: It is the difference between Right and Wrong. To coin a phrase from William Hurt in Gorky Park:
"We cannot fall into the chasm.... between what is said.... and what is done."
Who would want her running anyone's property Department?
And this just in, the UNANIMOUS Jury Verdict forms to follow. La Mar Gunn spanks U.S. Bank in Federal District Court, Case No. 2011-1155. This is the cover page to his Motion Reconsider. I told Eckert Seamans and Attorney Francis G.X. Pileggi that La Mar Gunn was the Real Deal a long time ago, keep reading my journal page as noted below; read it and weep fellas as some of the media clowns try to claim he is playing the race card, well the Federal Jury didn't think so.... so maybe, just maybe.... La Mar Gunn is right.
"The Defendant SPS has represented for years that it represents U.S. Bank as Trustee, but U.S. bank claims to represent the certificate holders of EQCC Home Equity Asset Backed Trust 1998-2 and at times EQCC Home Equity Asset Backed Trust 1998-3. Neither trust is active, nor does either trust have any certificate holders remaining. According to information submitted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Bank as trustee, the certificate holders in these trust were fully indemnified in 2005. Furthermore, Gunn intends to call the prosecuting attorney for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a witness to provide testimony that Shelton admitted to "fraud" while working for SPS flkJa Fairbanks Capital. Shelton and Defendant SPS have conspired in the uttering of counterfeit securities.
In the instant action, Defendant SPS has introduced two conflicting assignments of
mortgage, both coming well after either trusts' cut-off and closing dates. The trust are governed by New York Trust Law. The actions of Defendant SPS and their counsel are reprehensible and violate U.S. Securities law.
.....The bogus assignment was originally purported to have been retroactively
executed on September 30, 2002, and notarized by the infamous RoboSigner Nikole Shelton of Montgomery County Pennsylvania. This is an impossibility for several reasons which Ray Charles could see based on a voluminous number of uncontroverted facts already in the record. The attached exhibits show a corrupted business model that involves egregious acts of fraud being waged against African Americans and Hispanics primarily. By continuing to ignore the obvious, Delaware courts prove that the doors ofjustice only open to those who have the means to retain counsel.
This Honorable Court dismissed Gunn's claims that the Delaware State Courts were either corrupt or are way overdue for a securitization 101 lesson. It is unfathomable to believe that every court in Delaware could turn a blind eye to the fact that Defendant SPS is wreaking havoc on Delaware homeowners and has tainted the entire state's land record with fabricated documents. See Exhibits A - Z.
This court cannot be responsible for setting precedents that legalize fraud because the lower court refused to uphold the constitution or simply proceeded with an ulterior motive to aid and abet fraud. It is clear from the immeasurable number of FABRICATED mortgage documents filed by Defendant SPS, that the fraud is not limited to the instant action, but is widespread through Delaware and throughout the United States.
A copy of the attached assignments supra are believed to involve violations of federal laws and will be provided to state and federal authorities in the very near term. Title 18 USC § 4 state that: Whoever, having knowledge ofthe actual commission ofa felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Counterfeit documents have been filed into this court and the court has taken a blind stance very similar to that of Judge Silverman's. Gunn does not have a legal background, but it would seem that one does not have to have graduated suma cum laude from Harvard Law, to understand that even if Dorothy Davis and Francis Pileggi had successfully presented a counterfeit $100 bill at Family Dollar for payment of goods, Bloomingdales would be under no obligation to accept the counterfeit $100 bills; It is therefore axiomatic that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters and although a miscarriage of justice occurs in a state court, a court of federal jurisdiction is not bound to continue down the same path.
If Gunn has misinterpreted the law as to fraud, New York Trust Law, and U.S. Securities
Laws, Gunn humbly request this court provide fmdings of fact and conclusions of law to clarify Gunn's misinterpretation of the federal court's inherent authority to consider claims that if ignored by the court would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice."
files racism allegations.
as La Mar Gunn files his Election Complaint.
The challenges were dispatched. It got down to the count. It was verified. The votes were then carefully recounted according to the law. Lamar Gunn increased his lead. One person said she made a mistake when her tally did not add up to everyone else’s so they decided to recount every ballot instead of just her tally. Then they decided to have another recount after dinner when most of the 30 people had gone home to verify the last recount. It was presumed that the election would be certified, but the fateful decision was made to recount it yet again without a request to do so from the Department of Elections or the parties involved. That recount was already of dubious legitimacy. Even worse because most of the people were home now, they mixed all of the ballots together for the entire county and violated the separation by election district and Representative district. They counted the ballots and made a ruling to find voter intent where ballots may have been marked incorrectly. 4 new votes were found from previous undervotes. No one from our side was allowed to see them and they were mixed back into the mix. The Department of Elections was angry. They literally called it B. S. When the board of canvass was questioned about this, one of the attorneys became argumentative. The election was now tied.Both parties’ attorneys and the Department of Elections agreed to a solution. Let the ballots be run through the scanners one at a time and re-segregate them by district, count the ballots and find the 60 undervotes then check to find the 4 disputed ballots. The judges so ruled and told every one to go home. It was 10:30 p.m. Then 20 minutes later the court reconvened without petition from the parties and demanded oral arguments on the spot for statutory justification for delaying the certification and reversed their ruling. However the count certified was not the count on any of the tally sheets. It was a verbal count given by Lisa Robinson of the board of Canvass which gave a two vote victory to Ms. McKenna. Everyone was stunned. An election was being given to the loser.