Housing is a Civil Right

Housing is a Civil Right

Thursday, May 25, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Inform NYTimes Reporters Corkery and Protess that Citibank Mexican Money Laundering is Old Hat.



Dear Reporters Corkery and Protess,

Thank you for your coverage of the current scandal.
I am forwarding this to Twitter, FB and to Attorney Sam Shaulson with glee as I crack the biggest smile this morning. You see, I was a reporter for a large midwestern daily prior to law school so I figured you would get a kick out of this: The Salinas Affair (as depicted in the thumbnail).  I discovered all of this after a local Citibank manager wrongfully dishonored a check that was held by another man of color after I had helped him sue the shit out of a jackass lawyer named Jeffrey Denner.  Anyway, Google KingCast + Sam Shaulson, Esq. for shits and grins. He is pictured, above, next to the dirty dead rat, which is precisely where he belongs. Well not physically dead, but yes morally dead, and a rat indeed. In fact, I still have an entire blog dedicated to Citibank malfeasance even though I've not posted in it for six (6) years I keep it around because everything old.... is new again. See the excerpt below as I prove my point.

In fact, while some may not engage in Mexican drug money laundering all of the major banks are largely corrupt, and I say this having worked for a few of them as a residential closing attorney. I see it now as a mortgage consultant. Welcome to the downfall of Western Civilization folks.

******

Almost every multinational banking scam involves Citibank. I've been listing Enron, Ohio, California, Mexico, Russia and some of the others here and at Citibankisracist blog, but now here is yet another case closer to home and ongoing even. I have notified the authors of this 2009 Wall Street Journal story, "Citi, SEC Are in Talks to Settle Asset Probe." I'll tell you whose assets are getting probed: Those of the American Public if you catch my drift.
"Citigroup Inc. is in the early stages of negotiating with the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle an investigation into whether it misled investors by not properly disclosing the amount of troubled mortgage assets it held as the market began to implode in 2007, people familiar with the matter say.

Among issues being debated inside the SEC is whether, as a recipient of government-rescue funds, Citigroup should pay a large penalty in the case. There is concern at the SEC about the notion of financial firms in effect using taxpayer money to pay penalties, people close to the situation say. Citigroup received $45 billion from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program and plans to raise an additional $5.5 billion in capital from private investors."
Shaulson_SEC_Mortgage_Enron_hijab_Memorandum.doc.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Pierce County Judge of the Year at odds with Defendant Stanley J. Rumbaugh on Free Press.


Update on the underlying case: Fascinating that the area Judge of the Year Frank E. Cuthbertson makes the right call when addressing a media request but Judge Rumbaugh and his attorneys sit around and tell lies while the Federal Court protects them.


A principled Jurist who evaluates media requests and responds accordingly……

In direct opposition to Stanley Rumbaugh,a hegemonic warlord who treats alternative press with a measure of contempt reserved for one’s mortal enemy.

Google KingCast, Wally Brown and Chris Nubbe v. Stanley J. Rumbaugh.  Defendant Rumbaugh ran off to a sympathetic federal court on an improvident removal but we are going to the 9th Circuit and beyond for violations of Washington State GR 16.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Rumbaugh.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Ricardo S. Martinez in Federal as well, see below.



Federal Judge Ricardo S. Martinez allowed Counsel for Defendant Stanley J. Rumbaugh to lie about material aspects of a Free Press First Amendment case after Defendant Rumbaugh repeatedly violated Washington GR 16 that presupposes news media are to be GRANTED ACCESS to Courts. 

The Defendants and this Judge completely lied in the Record to find that none of us presented as media to the Defendant before he refused camera access, then when I filed a Notice of Fraud and a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions this Judge dismissed them out of hand so that the dirty State lawyers wouldn't even have to argue anything.

This case will move on toward the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and beyond, on the issue of whether granting or denying access to reporters is an Administrative or Judicial Function. 

This Judge of course never once mentioned the words "Administratvie Function" in his purported analysis of the case.

And yes it is a shame that taxpayers subsidize his income as well as that of the dirty state Judge and that of his lawyers as well.... Mark Lindquist's Office is notoriously dirty, just Google it.

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: Official Judicial Complaint Against Free Press Hater Judge Ricardo S. Martinez in 2:17-cv-00031-RSM King J.D. et al v. Rumbaugh.

Update on the underlying case: Fascinating that the area Judge of the Year makes the right call when addressing a media request but Judge Rumbaugh and his attorneys sit around and tell lies while the Federal Court protects them.


A principled Jurist who evaluates media requests and responds accordingly……

In direct opposition to Stanley Rumbaugh,a hegemonic warlord who treats alternative press with a measure of contempt reserved for one’s mortal enemy.

Google KingCast, Wally Brown and Chris Nubbe v. Stanley J. Rumbaugh.  Defendant Rumbaugh ran off to a sympathetic federal court on an improvident removal but we are going to the 9th Circuit and beyond for violations of Washington State GR 16.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Rumbaugh.

Ethics Charges have been filed against Ricardo S. Martinez in Federal as well.



Federal Judge Ricardo S. Martinez allowed Counsel for Defendant Stanley J. Rumbaugh to lie about material aspects of a Free Press First Amendment case after Defendant Rumbaugh repeatedly violated Washington GR 16 that presupposes news media are to be GRANTED ACCESS to Courts. 

The Defendants and this Judge completely lied in the Record to find that none of us presented as media to the Defendant before he refused camera access, then when I filed a Notice of Fraud and a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions this Judge dismissed them out of hand so that the dirty State lawyers wouldn't even have to argue anything.

This case will move on toward the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and beyond, on the issue of whether granting or denying access to reporters is an Administrative or Judicial Function. 

This Judge of course never once mentioned the words "Administratvie Function" in his purported analysis of the case.

And yes it is a shame that taxpayers subsidize his income as well as that of the dirty state Judge and that of his lawyers as well.... Mark Lindquist's Office is notoriously dirty, just Google it.